Originally posted by: Mark
I do too, but if Donnie continues to break the law by not releasing the whistleblower complaint how can we get the facts? If he released that along with the call transcript this whole thing could be cleared up in a couple of hours.
Actually, Stalker is just demonstrating that he's a Trumper--i.e., he can't read. The question Mark asked was about their opinions of a given deed--whether or not Trump committed that deed. "What is your opinion on the legality...?" Not of specifically Trump doing it--of anyone doing it.
And if Stalker and Don actually can read, then they're evading the question. "Is it legal to..." doesn't refer to any one person, even the Orange Asshole.
Let's put this another way, then. If Trump did in fact do this, would you consider it to be criminal behavior? Would you consider it serious enough for him to be indicted? Would you consider it serious enough for his to be impeached? Or in your eyes, is there no crime that Trump could actually commit?
Trump's little homunculus, Giuliani, appears to have validated that the conversations DID occur, as he tried to justify them in that rambling, incoherent interview that he gave, but testimony from one Trump lackey isn't enough proof by itself. However, Ukrainian officials are also validating it.
The best indicator will be when Trump refuses to hand over the White House phone transcripts.