Originally posted by: Charles Higgins
So..you just despise Durham and Trump ( among others and their credibility). That's the end of it. Your prerogative. I don't know Durham's level of credibility, though I'm aware he's been in DC most of his life.. What you referred to isn't likely enough to completely discount his potential and true ethics/ honor. You didn't answer my questions either ( regarding the report's evidence of bias..direct and indirect). You think it was all fair..totally based on factual evidence? I don't think so.That's the end of that. *l*
As usual, we haven't solved squat..but that's cool.
Charles, isn't the only meaningful conclusion one can draw from the Durham report that while the case was handled suboptimally by the FBI etc., it was found to be without substance?
If you want, you can try to pick apart whether that mild mishandling reflected true bias or simply that the result favored one side or the other because of what factual bases were available to draw conclusions...and since Russia was unhelpful and did not reveal the workings of its intelligence apparatus in interfering with our elections, that was kinda sorta inevitable? We're never going to know everything?