Far Left wing in a nutshell

I've posted the statistics about right wing terrorism vs left on this board many times.  And Boilerman routinely calls it fake news.   Got that?  Statisitcs are fake news.   THen he says the oppositte and backs it up with .....  nothing.   You just have to take his word for it.   

 

On the right you have organized groups with a mission statement of overthrowing our government.   And they aren't just rabble in the streets - they have sponcers in our federal government including the former president and several members of his inner circle.   Currently there are several members of COngress and the Senate who were either actively involved on that day - or are now attempting to rewrite history by suggesting the incident was overblown by the liberal media.

 

Boilerman shrugs that off because some unsponcered, unsupported no-name-losers with no authority in  Portland broke winshields with bricks.  My IQ isnt low enough to make that comparison.

 

 

Everyoe on the left supports the full investigation and incarceration of people engaged in violence in any BLM incidents.    The current approval rating of the Jan 6 investigation stands under 20% from Republicans.    Boilerman and friends dont want the architects of that incident investigated or held accountable.   Thats another big difference

The Jan 6 commission is a fraud as pelosi refused to admit the recomended Republicans.  She only chose her hacks.

 

Everyoe on the left supports the full investigation and incarceration of people engaged in violence in any BLM incidents.

 

If that was the case why were most of the cases dismissed within a couple of days?  The only people she allowed are her hacks

 

Speaking of stats; billions in damages, thousands of law enforcement injured & hardly anybody held responsible.

 

https://spectator.org/the-real-insurrection-the-blm-riots/

Gee, Tom, were you also upset when you found out OJ Simpson wasn't going to be the judge in his own trial?

 

Republicans wanted Jim Jordan on the committee who is himself under investigation for his communications with the White HOuse on Jan 6th which he has repeatedly dodged and obstructed.    And he's also one of the people who supported the failed legislative attempt to overturn the election in 2020.   

 

None of the BLM defendants are hiding behind executive  privilege, ignoring subponeas, or withholding documents or phone records.   All of the people Tom support are.     And, again, those are the people who wanted to overthrow our democracy - not just riot in the streets.

 

Happy New year 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, Tommie-poo, the Jan 6 riot was just a sightseeing tour.

 

I suppose I should be used to traitorous insurrection-supporting fools like Tommie-poo. His brain turned to mush a long time ago.

 

Racist Tommie-poo keeps pivoting to the BLM marchers. But they weren't trying to overthrow the government; they were trying to improve it. Stupid, racist Tommie-poo either doesn't understand or doesn't acknowledge the distinction.

 

Boiler, though slightly more coherent than Tommie-poo (a low bar to be sure), likewise distorts his thinking because of his sick, twisted racism. To Boiler and Tommie-poo, these two things are equivalent:

 

a) A huge mob of armed insurrectionists storming our nation's capital, with the intent of killing everyone within in order to stop the election's certification

b) Black marchers in cities protesting against the police murdering Black citizens

 

In fact, Boiler and Tommie-poo consider b) to be the more heinous, because it involves those uppity n*****s.


I'm still waiting for comments from our resident Liberals regarding their stance on Rowling's comments.  Is using the word "women" transphobic or is refusing to use this word stupid?

Originally posted by: Boilerman

I'm still waiting for comments from our resident Liberals regarding their stance on Rowling's comments.  Is using the word "women" transphobic or is refusing to use this word stupid?


Wait until you turn purple. What one person says has little consequence.

Kevin is obviously "woke".  He doesn't have the balls to let his opinion known on this topic.

Edited on Jan 5, 2022 8:39am

For starters there are no blm defendents as the local DA's refuse to prosecute them. They can't hide behind exec priv since none of them were president. 

 

There is no investigation of Jim Jordan & the email was doctored. He was excluded from the committee long before the phony email came out. 

 

Toxic kevin, no matter how many times you say it there was no insurrection. Check what the FBI said

 

Sorry kevin a riot that involves burning private & public property & injuring thousands of police officers is a riot. 

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin is obviously "woke".  He doesn't have the balls to let his opinion known on this topic.


No, Boiler. My opinion is that though this seems to really twist your panties, I don't give a shit one way or the other.

Originally posted by: Tom

For starters there are no blm defendents as the local DA's refuse to prosecute them. They can't hide behind exec priv since none of them were president. 

 

There is no investigation of Jim Jordan & the email was doctored. He was excluded from the committee long before the phony email came out. 

 

Toxic kevin, no matter how many times you say it there was no insurrection. Check what the FBI said

 

Sorry kevin a riot that involves burning private & public property & injuring thousands of police officers is a riot. 


No insurrection---God, Tommie-poo, you're such an idiot.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now