First Republican In Congress Calls For Impeaching Trump

Congressman Justin Amash (R-MI)

 

 

What follows are direct quotations from him:

 

Here are my principal conclusions:

 

1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.

 

2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.

 

3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.

 

4. Few members of Congress have read the report.

 

I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.

 

In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.

 

Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.

 

In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.

 

Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.

 

While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.

 

Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.

 

We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degrees—on the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.

 

Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.

 

 

America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.

 

 

 

...

 

 

 

It goes on. I encourage you to read it. Bravo, Congressman Amash.

 

Edited on May 18, 2019 7:38pm

Five Democrats voted to impeach Clinton.

Originally posted by: Charles

Five Democrats voted to impeach Clinton.


Amazing isn't it? Clinton lies about a blowjob and Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell prance around saying is their duty to impeach Clinton even though it is just a lie about a blowjob. Trump criminally obstructs justice multiple times and commits multiple felony campigan finance violations and the same two "moral crusaders" that touted "the rule of law" as requiring them to impeach a guy for lying about a blow job don't even utter a peep about Trump's felonious behavior. 

Originally posted by: Mark

Amazing isn't it? Clinton lies about a blowjob and Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell prance around saying is their duty to impeach Clinton even though it is just a lie about a blowjob. Trump criminally obstructs justice multiple times and commits multiple felony campigan finance violations and the same two "moral crusaders" that touted "the rule of law" as requiring them to impeach a guy for lying about a blow job don't even utter a peep about Trump's felonious behavior. 


What do Graham and McConnell have to do with 5 Democrats voting to impeach Clinton? Not a damn thing. Mark must have thought it was an opening for him to be Trump's prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner. Not your job!

 

Amash has been a Rino from day one.


So Trump's goal was to obstruct Mueller's finding of innocence.  That's your argument? Okay Libs, I'll be waiting for a whopper.  Please explain the logic behind this stance.

Edited on May 20, 2019 5:32am

Turns out amash is interested in running for president; another phoney politician

Originally posted by: Boilerman

So Trump's goal was to obstruct Mueller's finding of innocence.  That's your argument? Okay Libs, I'll be waiting for a whopper.  Please explain the logic behind this stance.


Last time I checked  foreign agent and Trump's hand-picked national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was convicted for felonies    ....   And Trump told the FBI director to ignore those felonies....and after Flynn flipped Trump's scumbag attourney called Flynn to disuade him from giving Mueller any dirt.

 

And according to Boilerman neither of those incidents is an attempt to obstruct the investigation?     

 

Just be honest and say you dont care.  Trump's minister of Newspeak gave you his 4-page propoganda piece that clears the president of wrongdoing.   And thats all Republicans want to hear and see...   And thats why Barr got that job.

 

 

If Obeyme and Hillary admitted under oath that they were behind the collusion witch hunt,  PJ would still blame President Trump. 

I dont have to deal with "if's"  and hypotheticals.   I read the actual report....not the "4-page edited for FOX News" cliff notes.  

According to Comey's testimoney before congress (in 2017) Trump said "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go."  He did not order Comey to do anything.  Comey did not 'let Flynn go'.  Comey did not even have the authority to 'let Flynn go' as the FBI does not make prosecution decisions, the Department of Justice does (Excelpt in the case of Hillary).  So how exactly was 'justice obstructed'? 

 

This was known 2 years ago.  It didn't just come out in the Mueller report.  So why are we even talking about it now?  Because the Colluson Narative is dead and that's all Democrats and the Media pushed for most of Trumps Presidency.

 

So if I say "I wish this bullshit political witch hunt was over and the congress started solving some problems" I guess I'm guilty of Obstruction of Justice too.  Or at least Contemp FOR Congress.  Arrest me.

Edited on May 20, 2019 8:24am
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now