Former Acting AG: “Trump Immunity Ruling May Lead to New York Mistrial”

Evil Democratic Party rigged the elections to control political power, launched warfare against their opponent, and worse, weaponized government institutions to attack anyone whom they deemed as a threat to their interests. Tyrant Joe thought he could get away with all their rigging and election interference. He claims “no one is under the law,” but he weaponizes the law against his rivals. But this is not the case now, as the tables have turned in favor of the former president after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of his presidential immunity appeal. Former acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker weighed on this issue during an interview with Newsmax on Friday. - Whitaker quipped that the recent ruling may affect Trump’s sham hush money trial in New York and raised the possibility of Judge Juan Merchan declaring a mistrial in favor of the Republican presumptive presidential nominee. What the court said in that opinion, I think the headline was that the official acts of the president are immune, but what the court also said, and is now binding law in the United States of America, is that any evidence of those official acts that would be immune, are no longer admissible in court to prove any other crimes,” Whitaker quipped. “And so that’s what Judge Merchan is going to have to wrestle with and decide and quite possibly could lead to a mistrial, because there was a lot of evidence from President Trump’s time as president and some of that testimony could have been this immune activities that would no longer be admissible. So, that’s going to be a very interesting question, I think, going forward,” he added. -https://theragingpatriot.org/former-acting-ag-trump-immunity-ruling-may-lead-to-new-york-mistrial/?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=st&utm_campaign=article

What's hilarious is that David and Trump's other corrnhole-slaves think that this ruling is good for the Turd. The actuality is that it may cost him the election.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

What's hilarious is that David and Trump's other corrnhole-slaves think that this ruling is good for the Turd. The actuality is that it may cost him the election.


 HaHaHaHaHa

If kevin was smart he would realize that this ruling also favors biden.  He can no longer be sued for the soldiers and civilians killed by his coawardly retreat in Afghanistan.  He and baldy can't be sued by the families of those killed by his open border policy.


Trump's "acting AG"?  thats big.

 

Pretty hard to say he has presidential immunity for crimes he committed before he was president.      And if you say doctoring your campaign accounting books is an offical act of state......well, you really just show how dangerous immunity is when left to the interpretation of right wing partisans.

 

PS - people who dont commit crimes dont need immunity.   

 

 

Originally posted by: tom

If kevin was smart he would realize that this ruling also favors biden.  He can no longer be sued for the soldiers and civilians killed by his coawardly retreat in Afghanistan.  He and baldy can't be sued by the families of those killed by his open border policy.


In what universe can a president be sued for war casualties? Aside, of course, from the fact that the SCOTUS ruling refers to CRIMINAL, not civil, liability.

 

God, Tom is stupid!

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Trump's "acting AG"?  thats big.

 

Pretty hard to say he has presidential immunity for crimes he committed before he was president.      And if you say doctoring your campaign accounting books is an offical act of state......well, you really just show how dangerous immunity is when left to the interpretation of right wing partisans.

 

PS - people who dont commit crimes dont need immunity.   

 

 


He's hoping that his SCOTUS lackeys will, if pressed, rule that virtually anything he does while in office is an official act, and anything he did during the last sixty years was an official act, too. And y'know what? He's probably justified in that hope!

 

That's why we have to kill him.

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Trump's "acting AG"?  thats big.

 

Pretty hard to say he has presidential immunity for crimes he committed before he was president.      And if you say doctoring your campaign accounting books is an offical act of state......well, you really just show how dangerous immunity is when left to the interpretation of right wing partisans.

 

PS - people who dont commit crimes dont need immunity.   

 

 


Anybody can be sued for anything. 


He could be sued for the incompetent way we withdrew. Find a friendly jurisdiction like the democrats did in NY & Ga & who knows what could happen. 

That's the point of the ruling   Liberals like Kevin & pj are to stupid to understand. 

Presidents have to have immunity for their decisions. 

Originally posted by: tom

Anybody can be sued for anything. 


He could be sued for the incompetent way we withdrew. Find a friendly jurisdiction like the democrats did in NY & Ga & who knows what could happen. 

That's the point of the ruling   Liberals like Kevin & pj are to stupid to understand. 

Presidents have to have immunity for their decisions. 


The SCOTUS ruling, stupid, has nothing to do with civil suits. If you had any kind of education, you'd know that sitting Presidents already are largely shielded from civil liability, thanks to a much earlier SCOTUS decision.

 

Presidents do NOT "have to have immunity." They should not be above the law. No one should.

 

Stupid Tom wants fascism. I don't.

Originally posted by: tom

Anybody can be sued for anything. 


He could be sued for the incompetent way we withdrew. Find a friendly jurisdiction like the democrats did in NY & Ga & who knows what could happen. 

That's the point of the ruling   Liberals like Kevin & pj are to stupid to understand. 

Presidents have to have immunity for their decisions. 


Tom - is doctoring your campaign accounting books an official act of state?   

What about calling up a governor and asking him to find votes?

Or ordering the VP to decertify a free and fair election?

Or conspiring with states to send fake electors to the Capital?

Or harrassing election workers?

Or obstructing and lying to the FBI after the president is out of office?

 

Tell us Tom !   GIve us your expert, non-partisan opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now