More good news! And more cognitive dissonance from David Miller and the rest of the Trump supporters here.
Linko
Edited on Oct 16, 2019 5:53pm
More good news! And more cognitive dissonance from David Miller and the rest of the Trump supporters here.
Linko
Reality--
Yep, a few days before the exlection they had Hillary winning by 2%-3% of the vote. She won the popular vote by 2.1% so I'd say they were right on the money.
Mark, do you ever get tired of being flat out wrong? She gained more yards in the game, but she got thumped by three touchdowns!
Popular vote has never determined the results of a Presidential election. My above posting shows the "polls" that had Hillary being ELECTED President. We know the result. And we also know the real value of "polls".
Stalker shows that he lacks even a basic understanding of statistics. The polls showed Hillary's "chances of winning." They did NOT say "she will win." An event with a 10% probability of happening--in this case, Trump winning the election--can and sometimes will happen. That it did happen doesn't mean the polls were "wrong"--just as if Hillary had won, that wouldn't have meant the polls were "right."
Stalker misunderstands the most fundamental element of the data he posted. The polls did NOT "have Hillary being elected President." They stated a probability. I don't know what Stalker means by "polls" as opposed to plain old polls, but I suspect he means any polls that report information he doesn't like. Polls do, in fact, have significant value.
The impeachment poll, in contrast, simply gathered people's opinions. It did not say that Trump would or would not be impeached, or any probability thereof.
I'm speaking waaaaay above our Trumpers' heads here, but the rest of you understand what I mean.
Does this fit your idiotic rant?---
And does someone who is leading ever eventually lose? Of course. That doesn't mean that any statement that the person was leading was inaccurate. "Leading." Not, "will win." "Leading." Those in the lead don't always win. Duh!
If a football announcer says that the Bears are leading by 7 with 5 minutes to go, and they eventually lose, does that mean that the announcer's statement was wrong?
You lack basic mental skills, I'm afraid. I was right when I said you wouldn't be able to comprehend what I was saying.
We are talking about polls - try to keep up.
Originally posted by: David Miller
We are talking about polls - try to keep up.
Yes. And polls that show someone is leading do NOT say that person is going to win. Try to comprehend that.
