Gen. Mike Flynn.....

  Apparently you remain confused - are you referring to the traitor brain dead Biden and his "the smartest man I know" son Hunter?

Did hunter participate in a coup attempt to overthrow the government?  Banging hookers and snorting coke isn't quite on the same level.

No, dipshit Charles, you're a mentally diseased conservitard fuck, but even you realize that the topic of this thread wasn't that Flynn committed a crime on the stand; he did something reprehensible but not illegal.

His crimes that he previously committed are under investigation. Duhhhhh.

Maybe you DO understand that someone innocent of any wrongdoing has no reason to take the 5th.

     What coup attempt? - you mean the "peaceful riot", as liberals like to describe their gatherings, that took place Jan 6?  Who are the "participants" you refer to? 

Traitors love traitors. Davey Dog loves Flynn.

*SMOOCH*

I was simply pointing out how Republicans treated a Democrat who took the 5th in congressional testimony vs the reverse.  Sorry you can't handle that.  You're not very smart....And as for the innocent taking the 5th there's plenty of reasons for that.  Here.  Let former Chief Justice Warren explain it to you.

"Chief Justice Warren offered this historical explanation for why the Fifth Amendment is designed precisely to protect the innocent from overzealous and unscrupulous accusers:

The privilege against self-incrimination is a right that was hard-earned by our forefathers. The reasons for its inclusion in the Constitution—and the necessities for its preservation—are to be found in the lessons of history. As early as 1650, remembrance of the horror of Star Chamber proceedings a decade before had firmly established the privilege in the common law of England. Transplanted to this country as part of our legal heritage, it soon made its way into various state constitutions and ultimately in 1791 into the federal Bill of Rights. The privilege, this Court has stated, “was generally regarded then, as now, as a privilege of great value, a protection to the innocent though a shelter to the guilty, and a safeguard against heedless, unfounded, or tyrannical prosecutions.”"

So Charles, You're comparing how the chairman of the hearing in one case responded vs how media pundits responded in another.     How incredibly dishonest of you.   Why dont you go Google how FOX News responded to Luis Lerner.

And thanks for that walk down memory lane.....the time when Republicans got all upset about the IRS for doing their job trying by finding political superpacs illegally commiting tax fraud.     The only scandal that culminated there is that almost of them were allowed to and still are allowed to.

Asking a retired 3 star general if he believes in the peaceful transfer of power in the US is neither a ''moot'' question nor a ''set-up''. SPOS.

The question asked of Flynn wasn't "tyrranical" in any way, and the only proper answer to it by any American, let alone a retired US Army General, is obvious.

Do YOU believe in the peaceful transfer of power, stupid insurrectionist Charles?

  Everyone here knows that Toad has difficulty with comprehension. The question is "moot" because everyone knows the answer - and - the question was asked to set up the next group of asinine questions that Rino Cheney was going to ask.