Gerrymandering

  Changing the subject does not change the illegal gerrymandering done in the DemocRAT states listed. All of the Republican states listed have none of the issues that the listed DemocRAT states have because they do not embrace the DemocRAT agendas. 

Do you always respond to a question with another question?

No. I don't know. It might be accurate, it might not be. I wasn't the one that stated a claim. 

I answered your question, now it's your turn to answer mine. 

He won't, because he would have to admit that he just swallowed it whole and barfed it up here without checking to see if it was true.

He responds with questions to questions he can't answer. That's intellectual cowardice. 

He constantly claims to post DUH TROOTFUL TROOT FACTY FACTS but when asked to provide proof of his claims, he scurries away like a cockroach when the lights come on.

For what it's worth, though the claims of percentages of Republican voters are dubious, the fact of the matter is that over a third of the states have one-party House representation. And more of those states are Republican than Democrat.

"Issues" have nothing to do with House representation, which is what you were bleating about.

Please explain to us why the Texas gerrymandering was legal but the California gerrymandering was not. And don't start babbling about ILLEGULS or something else irrelevant 

  The gerrymandering that the DemocRATs have done in numerous states for years are the reasons why DemocRATs were able to push thru asinine, anti- America legislations which are now the issues negatively affecting America.

When you lose the argument, change the subject.

🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪😂

You can make a similar list of Great Plains states with the same unanimous Republican House membership.    And that's ok.     If your state only has 2 districts then you can't draw a fair map to represent everyone.    

but if your state has 20 districts and they are all one party something is really unfair.    

this should not be a partisan issue.   Neither side really wins.   You end up with a more divided house full of fringists whose refuse to work across the aisle.   Does anyone really want that?

Yes. Republicans want that, because if control of the House, Senate, and White House was decided by popular vote, Republicans would lose every election , and they know that.

You don't necessarily wind up with a bunch of people on the extreme ends of the spectrum. If you have a district that is safely red or blue, a moderate can run and win, because his party affiliation/label will be the only thing that matters.