Originally posted by: tom
Warren is stuck at 7%, so she has to do something to generate some buzz.
Pocahontas?
Originally posted by: tom
Warren is stuck at 7%, so she has to do something to generate some buzz.
Pocahontas?
Trump has gone from saying the report is "total exoneration" to now saying its "total bullshit". He actually used that word in his presidential tweet.
You can add all of his hand picked aides and lawyerws that talked to Mueller to the list of Deep State boogeymen that are out to get him. Oh, and he's back to saying the MUeller team were all democrats too.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
I guess PJ forgets that the report confirmed ZERO evidence of collusion involving any American.
Collusion was an uncontested fact long before the report was released. Mueller states he did not prosecute anyone for it because "collusion" has no legal meaning.
Roger Stone's prosecution is still underway which involves his data sharing with Russian-fed wiki leaks. Its mostly in the redacted part of the report. We can await the results of the trial.
But if Boilerman does not like the word "collusion" maybe he can find a synonym for Don Jr's metting with Russians that he and his father later lied about. Or Jared Kushner's Seychelles meeting that sought a back channel of communication to the Kremlin. Or Donald Trump publicly calling out for Russia to help release Hillary's emails. Because all of these things are uncontested facts. Maybe collusion isnt the right word. How about "treason"?
The report said that President Trump & his associates did NOT conspire with the Russians to win the 2016 election
Once again when faced with the facts PJ chooses to ignore them.
Unlike PJ, I've not read the report..........only snippets. Would PJ be kind enough to cut and past the portion of the report addressing Mueller's assessment of collusion being "uncontested", and what Mueller considers the word "collusion" to mean. Did they collude to come up with the best coffee blend, best vodka, or what? Does colluding mean communicating with Russia, telling them to fuck off? Barr certainly was clear that the Trump administration made zero attempts to aid Russian in election tampering.......and he was utilizing the Mueller report. I'm guessing that Barr has read the entire report.
Like Mark, PJ makes shit up to "validate" their twisted views of reality. Since the time President Trump was elected, they have been proven to be liars over and over again - there is really no reason to give any value to anything they say. I certainly don't.
Does anyone actually believe that the U.S. doesn't spy on other countries and work to influence their elections (so-called or legitimate)? Does anyone actually believe that Russia had ceased to be a threat, had ceased to spy and work to influence U.S. elections prior to 2016?
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Collusion was an uncontested fact long before the report was released. Mueller states he did not prosecute anyone for it because "collusion" has no legal meaning.
Roger Stone's prosecution is still underway which involves his data sharing with Russian-fed wiki leaks. Its mostly in the redacted part of the report. We can await the results of the trial.
But if Boilerman does not like the word "collusion" maybe he can find a synonym for Don Jr's metting with Russians that he and his father later lied about. Or Jared Kushner's Seychelles meeting that sought a back channel of communication to the Kremlin. Or Donald Trump publicly calling out for Russia to help release Hillary's emails. Because all of these things are uncontested facts. Maybe collusion isnt the right word. How about "treason"?
Collusion was only "an uncontested fact" before (and after) the report to brain damaged liberals and their media cohorts. He didn't prosecute anyone for it because IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
What "metting" did Don Jr. have with "Russians" (plural)? Are you talking about a meeting with a Russian woman concerning adoption of Russian children? Is that your definition of collusion with the Russian government to influence the election? (apparently, it is)
I have no idea what you are referring to with Kushner, but given your usual belief of something that didn't happen versus what actually happened, it could be anything. Literally anything.
Trump told Russia, the entire country, to release Hillary's emails, on national television. Yeah, that was him being serious! I pity people whose hate runs so deep that it drives them batcrap crazy.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
They arrested his lawyer for that check. Because, ya know, it was a felony. And theman who signed his name on that check is every bit as guilty as the one who turned around and delivered it to a porn star.
They didn't arrest his lawyer for that check. They didn't prove it was a crime. They couldn't, because it wasn't. They added it and another check to a plea deal. They knew they could get guilty pleas for two things that were not crimes by promising leniency in sentencing on the charges that actually were crimes. If the nondisclosure agreements and payments had been taken to trial, the charges would have been dismissed because nondisclosure agreements and payments ARE NOT ILLEGAL!
Slimy lawyers were trying to set precedent without going to trial. It worked on you, and other Trump hating leftists.
Candy you are sooooooo right, the great USA is in the middle of every election in the world. Also, Nobody talks about the "collusion" Between the media and the DEMS.
