Supporting Documentation
Supporting Documentation
According to Cohen - Trump, Hannity, and Broidy were his only clients. But he’s also taking cash from Russians, ATT, and Novartis who are not his clients. Which one of his clients is he taking that money on behalf of?
Gee whiz, I dont know. Pretty sure it’s not Sean Hannity. :). All three of those “donors” have a lot to answer for. ATT states they hired Cohen as a consultant.....Which would mean Cohen had more than 3 clients...or ATT is lying
Yawn..... And in other fake news....
Sure Doc. Not even Trump's second favorite judge, Judge Andrew Napolitano, buys that.
“The problems for the president’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, just continue to mount,” Napolitano observed. “And these problems, depending upon where they lead to, may draw the president in.”
“Why was a Russian billionaire giving a half a million dollars to the president’s lawyer — at the time the lawyer was paying, not only Stormy Daniels, but according to Rudy Giuliani, other women, to remain silent about their relationships to the president?” he asked. “Nobody knows the answer to this, yet.”
“But all of it is enough to provoke a federal judge in Los Angeles … to say, ‘I think we should put the case on hold, because Mr. Cohen is about to be indicted,'” he noted.
“The president’s lawyer getting indicted can’t be good for the president,” Napolitano explained.
“Mr. President, please be wary of all of this,” he cautioned.
Oh, and Novartis is saying Cohen promised them access to Trump for the $1.2 million dollars they paid him. So you have the Russians, a pharmaceutical company and AT&T funding Trump’s extra-marital affair slush fund.
What you really have is a bunch of misinformed people talking about something they really know nothing about. The molehill keeps getting bigger as the fake news continues. Maybe you alarmists should get your heads out of the gutter and pay attention to what is happening in the rest of the world. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
Originally posted by: Mark
Supporting Documentation
Note language "may have reimbursed the $130 K payment" may have, may not have?
These the same Russians that give the Clinton Foundation the millions and Yes we have a uranium deal?
get real, your shit on here just gets older and older!
Judge Napolitano is frequently wrong
Novartis has already confessed today their payment was for access to the president to discuss "Healthcare Policy Matters"...and there is you pay for play. I'll let the investigation reveal the context of the other payments.
A any rate its fully evident Trump didn;t drain the swamp - but only added more shit to it. ALot more.
We are now finding out that Avenatti may have used several Michael Cohen's. The Treasury is investigating how Avenatti was able to get this confidential info. He may have violated privacy laws.
