Home schooling: data sets

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas

I shouldn't presume to add to this discussion since I have no kids, but a difference in home schooling THEN (when it really was a choice) to home schooling NOW (the last school year, at least) has to be significant if viewed in global fashion.  Back THEN (my day), before computers, the matriarch would commit to the hours, the school district's curricula, etc.  One on one, at least some elementary grades.   Now I'm seeing mothers describing a lot of stress from suddenly having to become teachers, maybe to multiple children at different learning levels, i.e. ages.  What I was reading about my local area concerned some students taking the instruction over Zoom, others of same classroom/grade getting the same material at their desks in the brick and mortar classroom with teacher.  How motivated, self-directed, behavior-compliant is the kid at home to pay attention to the teacher on the computer?  Wow, what a mess, I'd guess.  As I said, I really have no idea about these things, just thoughts.

 

Candy


A few parents have told us that they chose to home school their kids precisely because it was obvious that the Zoom thing wasn't working, and with the brick and mortar schools closed, they felt it was the only remaining option. I'm sure that many of them felt neither qualified nor inclined to do that, but as Mister Picture points out, perhaps parental motivation is the dominant factor behind a kid's success. Who knows? That may very well be of great significance in normal times, too. No way to reliably measure that that I'm aware of.

Doesn't surprise me at all; most teachers do the bare minimum each day.  

Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33

Doesn't surprise me at all; most teachers do the bare minimum each day.  


Did you get molested by a teacher or something?  You seem to have a real issue with that profession.

NYC thinks they lost 180,000 students this year.  They are not sure if they moved, went to another school or are truant.  An amazing indictment of the NYC Board of Ed incompetence.  They are also short 3,000 teachers.

 

While there are many elite private schools such as Fieldston, there are many private school such as the NYC Catholic school system as well as others nationwide that are for middle class students.  People are frustrated by the poor education they see their children getting in public school. The defining characteristic is that the parents are willing to sacrifice so their children can get a good education.

 

NYC also has a successful charter school program that has a huge waiting list & cannot expand since the teachers union has forced the legislature to put a cap on the number of schools. 


Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Did you get molested by a teacher or something?  You seem to have a real issue with that profession.


Jerry pretends to be ignorant, but I don't buy it. He knows as well as anyone that teachers work many hours that are after school and unpaid. They correct homework, lay out lesson plans, etc.

 

Though I suppose it's possible that he was a horrible student, wound up cleaning toilets for a living, and blames all his teachers for his failures. We know he isn't a "finance expert."

Originally posted by: tom

NYC thinks they lost 180,000 students this year.  They are not sure if they moved, went to another school or are truant.  An amazing indictment of the NYC Board of Ed incompetence.  They are also short 3,000 teachers.

 

While there are many elite private schools such as Fieldston, there are many private school such as the NYC Catholic school system as well as others nationwide that are for middle class students.  People are frustrated by the poor education they see their children getting in public school. The defining characteristic is that the parents are willing to sacrifice so their children can get a good education.

 

NYC also has a successful charter school program that has a huge waiting list & cannot expand since the teachers union has forced the legislature to put a cap on the number of schools. 


Neither NYC nor any other school district in the country tracks the locations of its former students after they leave the district. That would be a gross invasion of privacy.

 

So much for your "amazing indictment."

Whether they lost none or 1 million students, the fact remains that NYC "thinks" they lost 180,000 students last year - those are NYC own words - not Tom's. And, of course, you have nothing to say about the shortage of 3000 teachers. There was no "indictment," just your typical fact twisting, moronic reply.

Edited on Oct 13, 2021 3:43pm
Originally posted by: David Miller

Whether they lost none or 1 million students, the fact remains that NYC "thinks" they lost 180,000 students last year - those are NYC own words - not Tom's. And, of course, you have nothing to say about the shortage of 3000 teachers. There was no "indictment," just your typical fact twisting, moronic reply.


Nope. You're lying. NYC didn't say that they "think" they "lost" any students whatsoever.

 

If you "quote" something that wasn't actually said, you're lying. Liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now