Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
Spretire22 seems satisfied with his own answer: he will "carry where allowed by law and protect myself and family."
Yet, I don't see the answer regarding a gun being "concealed in the car" in the parking lot at Hoover Dam. Spretire22 already experienced one "search" of his vehicle there. The searchers were "pretty intimidating", which suggests to me they don't want no 'stinking' guns (LOL, movie quote) on the premises, concealed or not. But I didn't see that specifically answered yes or no, even in Kevin's informative "editorial."
Assuming a gun was locked in a proper box in the trunk, or inside the car, or in the glove box, and/or if Spretire 22 declared the gun present before the start of the search, would that satisfy the searchers?
Candy
From what appears on the websites of the dam itself and the DoE, you can't take a gun there, period, no matter how "safeguarded" it may be. The reason undoubtedly is fear of terrorism. They just don't want weapons anywhere near the dam, and you can certainly see why (channel your inner Sylvester Stallone).
While the risk of being stopped and your car searched is perhaps minimal (and might increase drastically at any given time, for a host of reasons), I can't see any upside in carrying a gun in your car for your Hoover Dam excursion. The likelihood of "needing" it to thwart some foul miscreant (and of successfully doing so should that occur) is about the same as that of hitting Megabucks (and, editorial comment: many gun lovers would rather gun down a foul miscreant than win Megabucks).
The legal issue of giving or not giving consent to a search does NOT apply when you are on federal property where giving automatic consent to be searched is one of the conditions of entry. You've seen the signs posted at airports, etc. I would assume you might be treated a bit more courteously if you told the searchers you had a gun and where to find it. But you would still be turned away.
And BTW, it's "steenkin'". We don't need no steenkin' badges!