Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
I stand corrected, according to AP News, Trump made two deals in 90 days, still an abysmal failure.
I don't think you understand the concept of these trade negotiations. These are attempts to secure more favorable terms in our trading relationships and level the playing field to account for non-tariff barriers, higher tariffs from our trading partners, and significant trade deficits. You better believe our trading partners are in no hurry to implement anything that reduces their trade surpluses. So they need to be pressured.
You probably don't realize that normal international trade deals take an average of 18 months to sign and 45 months to implement. So any favorable trade deal that Trump can negotiate this year is far faster than how these deals have been drawn out in the past.

The 90-day timeline and the pauses are strategic negotiating ploys to put pressure on our trading partners. In addition to the deals with the UK, Vietnam, and China, Trump just wrapped up negotiations with 14 countries by sending them a letter that specifies what their new tariffs will be. (lol).
A look at the countries that received tariff letters from Trump | PBS News
Make no mistake, those letters were also a strategic negotiating ploy. If you read the link, you'll note that many of the countries that got letters are redoubling their efforts to make a real trade deal. The letters are also a way to put pressure on the countries that are currently in negotiation and close to deals...because they don't want to get a letter.
If you want to talk about abysmal failures, note that there were exactly zero comprehensive free trade agreements negotiated by the Biden administration, so any new major trade deal the Trump administration negotiates is a plus for America. Delivering any comprehensive trade deals in 90 days is virtually unheard of. If we can get several more done this year, it will be a great accomplishment and not a failure.
And finally, to illustrate the real issue of the massive trade deficits we are running, I have a simple math problem for you.
Just suppose that we remove US international trade (imports and exports) from our GDP calculation and nothing else changes. What do you think would happen to GDP?