I see Miller is pissing all over the forum again

Originally posted by: Mark

I'd be happy with rule one. I suspect it would be difficult to implement without human monitoring which means it won't be implemented.  If David can't behave himself he should be removed as that is the option that doesn was the LVAs resources. David can say whatever he wants and I am fine with that. What I am not fine with is his spamming so users can't see the active topics. He is trying to drown out everyone else's discussion. 


 Spamming? Can't see active topics? What you can't stand is that you can not dispute the content of my posts. As I have said before, if the truthful content of my posts is something that you can not dispute as being truthful, just block me. Otherwise quit your crying. 

When David labels his garbage "truthful" over and over and over, that's a dead giveaway that he doesn't believe it himself.

 

I've schooled him before on what a lie is...and is not. Yet, he screams at and calls a LIAR LIAR LIAR anyone who simply disagrees with him.

 

His intent is obviously to dominate the Sink and not let anyone else have a word in edgewise.

 

He thinks that the reason he's so despised is that he's "owning the libs" with his "truthful facts." That's not it. He's despised because he's an asshole and contributes nothing.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

When David labels his garbage "truthful" over and over and over, that's a dead giveaway that he doesn't believe it himself.

 

I've schooled him before on what a lie is...and is not. Yet, he screams at and calls a LIAR LIAR LIAR anyone who simply disagrees with him.

 

His intent is obviously to dominate the Sink and not let anyone else have a word in edgewise.

 

He thinks that the reason he's so despised is that he's "owning the libs" with his "truthful facts." That's not it. He's despised because he's an asshole and contributes nothing.


  The chief liar spews more lies here...

Originally posted by: David Miller

  The chief liar spews more lies here...


Uh huh. Calling people LIAR LIAR LIAR is all you've got.

 

It's childish. You really do sound like a six year old in the recess yard.


Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Uh huh. Calling people LIAR LIAR LIAR is all you've got.

 

It's childish. You really do sound like a six year old in the recess yard.


 Calling you a liar is all I need - you prove it everyday you post.

Originally posted by: David Miller

 Calling you a liar is all I need - you prove it everyday you post.


Child.

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

I don't really know what the forum software they use is. But it certainly seems pretty limited compared to other forums. I can't even find a section with forum settings. I don't see a way to manage a list of blocked users so I'm not sure if I could unblock someone once I block them.

 

 Not sure if blocking would solve anything anyway as I suspect one would still see started threads from blocked users. 

 

Someone with admin powers may be able to change a setting that limits how many threads a user  may start in a certain time period. However I suspect that this forum does not have such a setting. 

 

It appears to me the folks at LVA work hard enough on other things. I don't expect them to spend much time with forum moderation. 

 

 


One can block or unblock contributors easily here..or not show up at all . It's well established that controversy and/ or conflict actually drives participation in numerous online forums and that includes the polarized Sink. Essentially some simply show up here FOR the argumentation. I assume more clicks is a good thing for LVA and I suspect that they don't have the time nor inclination to babysit /constantly moderate this subforum. Conflict can be constructive in these Sink forum discussions but that is truly rare here. Ironically,the negativity observed here is often based on knee-jerk reaction to not necessarily accurate / totally biased info ( or before participants do a bit of research that confirms / debunks certain info). Often the need or preponderance for some contributors to "be out front" overrides it all. Over time one realizes that some behaviors just won't change or even be tempered.

 

Bottom line is one can control how much or how often they endure or enjoy here; there are options. Many of the tenets of free speech thrive in here, though there would be further arguments about the boundaries of Sink free speech with regard to " causes no harm" ( eg true threats, inticement, defamation et al). For me rare participation here has a bunch of merit , FWIW. lol

 

You have options.

I posted the following in another thread, maybe better here given the title. I'll add that it goes both ways for those who think this is license to attack David Miller. It's not.

 

David, this will stop now. You're not clever and you're not fooling anyone with what you're doing with all of these posts. You have so much time on your hands, lucky you. But you're not spending it at our and everyone elses expense here anymore. You're prohibited from starting another thread for two weeks. You can still post on others, but if you're doing the same thing within other posts you'll be banned for a month and then permanently.

Originally posted by: Anthony Curtis

I posted the following in another thread, maybe better here given the title. I'll add that it goes both ways for those who think this is license to attack David Miller. It's not.

 

David, this will stop now. You're not clever and you're not fooling anyone with what you're doing with all of these posts. You have so much time on your hands, lucky you. But you're not spending it at our and everyone elses expense here anymore. You're prohibited from starting another thread for two weeks. You can still post on others, but if you're doing the same thing within other posts you'll be banned for a month and then permanently.


  Here is my response (posted in another thread) -  (1) This is your website and you can do whatever you wish. (2) Censoring/banning me will not change what is and has happened in America, who is responsible, and the forthcoming reporting concerning these events. (3) I do find it concerning that you prefer to ban me for my honest, truthful linked content that I post while having little to say about the hateful, foul mouthed, lies and insults posted by others.

Originally posted by: David Miller

  Here is my response (posted in another thread) -  (1) This is your website and you can do whatever you wish. (2) Censoring/banning me will not change what is and has happened in America, who is responsible, and the forthcoming reporting concerning these events. (3) I do find it concerning that you prefer to ban me for my honest, truthful linked content that I post while having little to say about the hateful, foul mouthed, lies and insults posted by others.


Your content is neither honest nor truthful. At best, it's just someone's opinion --and not even your own. 

 

It's stupidly arrogant to call all of your opinions "truth" and all the opinions of others that you disagree with "lies." I'm sure that you don't even faintly understand that doing so weakens, not strengthens, your arguments.

 

Now insult me, as you always do reflexively in response to criticism. And DEFINITELY don't forget to say "YOU TOO! YOU TOO! YOU TOO!" like a child caught stealing a cookie. Whatever you do, don't change your demeanor or behavior. Keep "owning the libs."

 

😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now