I Wonder if Americans Have Had Their Eyes Opened by the Verdict Today?

As we can once again see here by the moronic statements made by the brainwashed liberals that post here - who are vividly too ignorant to comprehend what every same person knows - this asinine verdict is not about justice but is solely about the continued ruination of America. 

 

Trump had a gag order because of his bad behavior.

 

Cohen & daniels were acting like model citizens?  Trump called out the conflict of munchies' daughter working for the democrat campaign & munchy donating to Trump's opponent. while he presided over a trial involving the democrats leading opponent

Tom's new rule....

judges' daughters must be registered Republicans 

  PJ is a classic example of the adage - "no one so blind as one who refuses to see".

Edited on May 31, 2024 10:36am

Trump's elections only count when he wins.

trump's trials only count when he wins

and military drafts only count when he's not selected.

 

you can tell he grew up as an elite, entitled little brat.   That's his excuse.   Tom and David don't have one beyond subscribing to a cult

The long standard rule is no conflict of interest when the family is a financial beneficiary of how the case goes or donate to the campaign of the person who benefits from the case.

 

munchies is guilty of both

Edited on May 31, 2024 12:28pm

Did a Russian agent tell you that?   


The judge in Trump's document case was appointed to her role by the defendant in the case she's overseeing.   I can't wait to see how Tom moves the goal posts when Trump is found guilty in that trial too.   

Originally posted by: tom

The long standard rule is no conflict of interest when the family is a financial beneficiary of how the case goes or donate to the campaign of the person who benefits from the case.

 

munchies is guilty of both


So your position is Tom Esq. has more expirence and knowldge of the law than a Judical ethics commission made up of other Judges with decades of expirence?

 

 

The judge in the case asked for and recived from a judical ethics commission a ruling to determine if he had a conflict that required recusal. That board which is made up of retired and long serving  judges  ruled he did not.  If only Alito and Thomas paid attention to judical ethics like this judge did.

 

 

The NYS ethics board is a collection of democrat hacks.

 

4 are picked by the governor; in this case cuomo & hochul (who does whatever the party bosses say). 3 are picked by the chief judge who once freed a convicted rapist.  Even Newsday said he is the most liberal judge in the state.  One each by the state senate & assemby leaders (they of the no bail laws) & the Republcans get 2.

 

So again a stacked deck

 

More suspicious activity.

Judges are supposed to be assigned randomly, but somehow out of the thousands of cases in NYC this judge has been randomly assigned to all 4 Trump cases.

Edited on May 31, 2024 2:51pm

The judge in Trump's document case was appointed to her role by the defendant in the case she's overseeing.

 

That is the case where the FBI is in trouble over mishandling the evidence.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now