I Wonder if Americans Have Had Their Eyes Opened by the Verdict Today?

Tom has really lost it. I feel sorry for him.  He grasps at any fringe conspiracy theory to conclude Donald Trump isn't a felon.

I got news for you Tom. I met a lot of criminals in my time as an attorney. What stands out to me is how many of them talk just like Trump.  They are only there because the system is rigged against them or that the prosecutor wouldn't cut them a good deal because they are worried about their up coming election.

Trump is a crook and has been for the entirety of his adult life.  He is used to getting away with it. What he thinks is unfair is that they actually prosecuted him for his crimes this time.  He thinks a man of his social status, rich and white, should never be prosecuted for any crime.

Most MAGAs agree rich, white and Christian folks should never be prosecuted. They think the criminal justice system only exists to control black and brown people and are shocked when a rich white guy is prosecuted. 

I've stopped fact-checking tom because he is such an obvious liar. But sometimes it's just too easy!

The DA promised in his campaign to prosecute Mr. Trump? Never happened.

The judge refused to allow a defense witness to appear? Never happened.

Do you dispute that Trump took several hundred government documents (several classified) when he left?  Do you dispute that he refused to return then when the National Archives asked for them?  Do you dispute that he moved documents prior to a search to keep them from the government?  Do you dispute that he ordered subordinates to hide documents?  But, your conclusion is that "FBI is in trouble"?  Do you ever tire of shilling and sacrificing your intellectual integrity to this despicable hunan being.  

I do wonder what manner of bizarre charisma the Turd has, that he's obtained stupid Tom's slavish, drooling loyalty--not to mention that of millions of other MAGAs.

MP as usual is ignorant on the subject

The DA promised in his campaign to prosecute Mr. Trump? Never happened. 

I live here.  He did.  This is the same DA who chooses to prosecute bodega employees who choos to defend themselves.  He also chose not to prosecute crimes.

The judge refused to allow a defense witness to appear? Never happened.

Bradley Smith a FEC commissioner was not allowed to testify on his knowledge of campaign law and how it applied to this case.

ABC News:

"Smith, who was appointed to the FEC by former President Bill Clinton, acknowledged in an X post on Monday that he did not testify because of a decision made by the defense. He added that he had intended to testify about complicated background knowledge necessary to understanding the case, rather than about the law.May 24, 2024"

Facts are stubborn things--unless people (you know, Tom) simply chooses to ignore them.  

Now for the rest of the story that ABC neglected to show. Munchies wouldn't allow the expert on election law to testify on his area of expertise.  So there was no longer any point in calling him.  Munchies allowed cohen the liar give his opinion on election law but wouldn't allow the expert on election law to testify.

Smith served as an FEC commissioner and chair between 2000 and 2005. The FEC is the U.S. agency dedicated to enforcing campaign finance laws. His testimony was slated to shed light on prosecutors’ allegations that Trump falsified business records, which is a misdemeanor that has already passed the statute of limitations, in order to cover up an election violation.

Judge Merchan has so restricted my testimony that defense has decided not to call me

"But the Federal Election Campaign Act is very complex. Even Antonin Scalia – a pretty smart guy, even you hate him – once said ‘this [campaign finance] law is so intricate that I can’t figure it out.’ Picture a jury in a product liability case trying to figure out if a complex machine was negligently designed, based only on a boilerplate recitation of the general definition of ‘negligence.’ They’d be lost without knowing technology & industry norms," he continued.

Smith wrote on social media that while the prosecution’s star witness, Michael Cohen, was allowed to go "on at length about whether and how his activity violated" the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), he was barred from broadening the scope of his previously anticipated testimony, which "effectively" led to the jury getting "its instructions on FECA from Michael Cohen!"

tom will now quote the DA promising to prosecute Mr. Trump during his campaign. That is, if tom has any integrity.

Ha, ha, ha ha. Sometimes I crack myself up.

I don't know what country Tom lives in where witnesses are called to explain and interpret laws in a courtroom.   Maybe it's the same country where Russian agents can testify with fabricated stories.    

glad I don't live in  that third world shithole.