ICE Thug Murders Person In Minnesota

Once again, liberals looting, burning, destroying in their so called protests.  Charlie Kirk was assasinated and did you see a multi city riot?  Nope, only one side is violent.

Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya

Once again, liberals looting, burning, destroying in their so called protests.  Charlie Kirk was assasinated and did you see a multi city riot?  Nope, only one side is violent.


And Jan 6 was a peaceful protest, with all the colorful balloons,  guest jugglers, and free Gatorade. That gallows and the "KILL MIKE PENCE" signs were just peaceful symbology. And they didn't break into any buildings. They knocked and showed their visitor passes. Good job getting over a thousand of them with a few hours' notice.

 

Oh, I almost forgot all the fluffy white 🐇 🐇 🐇 🐇 they brought. 100 percent peaceful,  yes siree Bob.

Here is a graphic slo-mo of the shooting showing the car heading towards the agent causing him to draw his weapon as the car advances --  https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1831668314221050

Edited on Jan 8, 2026 6:41pm
Originally posted by: David Miller

Here is a graphic slo-mo of the shooting showing the car heading towards the agent causing him to draw his weapon as the car advances --  https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1831668314221050


Facebook is not a valid source.


Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Facebook is not a valid source.


      Of course it is.

Originally posted by: David Miller

      Of course it is.


Well, I know you think it is...but when someone posts a video on Facebook, it's what they want to post, meaning that anything they don't want to show is edited out. Any source where the originator is biased is invalid. Any source where the originator is not a professional news reporter who follows ethical standards is invalid  The opinions of one Facebook rando are irrelevant and invalid as a news source.

  The Facebook posts I repost are factual. The linked sources are factual. Your denial of their validity is your opinion. The quality and truthfulness of "professional news reporters" - such as those on MSNBC CNN, ABC , etc - have been found to be dubious, at best. But, believe what you want - I stand by the posted Facebook information I repost.  You are welcome to refute any and all of my Facebook reposts at any time with provable sources that refute their validity - to date you have never done so except by being dismissive without facts to back up your claim(s). ----  Furthermore, I think that everyone here in the Sink would prefer that you stop with the constant criticism of what I and others post here. Disputing the facts/context of a post is fine - but the constant attacking of others for what they post is unwarrented and umwelcomed.

Edited on Jan 9, 2026 8:39am
Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya

Once again, liberals looting, burning, destroying in their so called protests.  Charlie Kirk was assasinated and did you see a multi city riot?  Nope, only one side is violent.


The government didn't kill Kirk. 

 

On a positive note for our MAGA friends, when George Floyd was killed, they were upset that Libs don't riot for white people deaths. You should be happy the Libs don't discriminate when the government illegally kills US citizens.

Originally posted by: David Miller

  The Facebook posts I repost are factual. The linked sources are factual. Your denial of their validity is your opinion. The quality and truthfulness of "professional news reporters" - such as those on MSNBC CNN, ABC , etc - have been found to be dubious, at best. But, believe what you want - I stand by the posted Facebook information I repost.  You are welcome to refute any and all of my Facebook reposts at any time with provable sources that refute their validity - to date you have never done so except by being dismissive without facts to back up your claim(s). ----  Furthermore, I think that everyone here in the Sink would prefer that you stop with the constant criticism of what I and others post here. Disputing the facts/context of a post is fine - but the constant attacking of others for what they post is unwarrented and umwelcomed.


Then you should stop doing that 

 

Let me ask you a question that I very much doubt you have the guts to answer. How many times have you called people here liars? How many times have you called people "delusional"? How many times have you disparaged people for disagreeing with you?

 

You complaining about "constant attacking of others" is truly hilarious. Your constant labeling of the crap you post as "truthful facts" shows that you don't believe it any more than we do. 

 

All that said, I will do my best to disagree with the utter Trump-licking garbage you post without criticizing you personally. We'll see if you revert to your Nasty David persona when Anthony's ban expires.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Then you should stop doing that 

 

Let me ask you a question that I very much doubt you have the guts to answer. How many times have you called people here liars? How many times have you called people "delusional"? How many times have you disparaged people for disagreeing with you?

 

You complaining about "constant attacking of others" is truly hilarious. Your constant labeling of the crap you post as "truthful facts" shows that you don't believe it any more than we do. 

 

All that said, I will do my best to disagree with the utter Trump-licking garbage you post without criticizing you personally. We'll see if you revert to your Nasty David persona when Anthony's ban expires.


  All one has to do is review the numerous times you have posted out and out lies the past 9 years. One who does this is commonly known as a habitual liar. I "disparage" people who refuse to use common sense and who post knowingly untruthful content. On the rare occasions I have been proven wrong, I have admitted so and apoligized. I have never seen another here do the same after they have been proven wrong. Their usual action is to distort or divert the topic, all the while never admitting they were wrong. Everyone here knows who attacks others incessently whenever others do not agree with that person's viewpoint. 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now