Ignored ICE detainers ‘put lives at risk,’ DHS says, targeting Newsom, Pritzker, Healey

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

---

No, you SAY I'm lying. And even you, stupid fuck that you are, know that I'm not really lying--you're just saying that because you lack the intellect to coherently argue or do anything besides copy and paste other assholes' idiot shit.

---

Originally posted by: jstewa22

---

Kevin, sometimes David does post coherent arguments, like "HAHAHAHAHAHHA" (might have spelled that wrong, sorry).  Or "I know you are, but what am I?"

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

 'Newsom and his fellow sanctuary politicians ... are releasing murderers, pedophiles, and drug traffickers back into our neighborhoods,' DHS said -- As congressional Democrats continue to vote to defund the Department of Homeland Security, the agency is calling out the "dangerous derangement" of sanctuary state leaders who it says are "putting American lives at risk" by releasing illegal immigrant pedophiles, murderers and gang members. --- A spokesperson for DHS slammed Democratic Governors Gavin Newsom of California and JB Pritzker of Illinois, both rumored 2028 Democratic presidential candidates, and also Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey. "Governor Newsom and his fellow sanctuary politicians — including Pritzker and Healey — are releasing murderers, pedophiles, and drug traffickers back into our neighborhoods and putting American lives at risk," the spokesperson told Fox News Digital. ---- The spokesperson cited statistics showing that seven out of 10 of the safest cities in the U.S. cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. They issued a personal appeal to the Democratic governors, saying, "If we work together, we can make America safe again."----"Criminal illegal aliens should not be released from jails back onto our streets to terrorize more innocent Americans," the spokesperson continued, adding that the agency is "calling on sanctuary politicians to stop this dangerous derangement and commit to honoring ICE arrest detainers.----Most of the 10 safest cities on U.S. News & World Report's list are located either in states or counties that have laws directing municipal authorities to cooperate or coordinate directly with federal immigration enforcement. That cooperation often occurs through 287(g) agreements, which allow local law enforcement agencies to work directly with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The cities also share other traits, such as high median incomes and a lack of mixed-use zoning or transient rental housing, underscoring the ongoing debate over whether immigration enforcement cooperation plays a meaningful role in public safety ----According to the DHS, there are more than 33,000 criminal illegal aliens in California’s custody. The spokesperson cited several illegal immigrants with criminal records arrested by ICE in the last year who were released in California despite ICE detainers, including child predators and gang members. ----https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ignored-ice-detainers-put-lives-risk-dhs-says-targeting-newsom-pritzker-healey

---

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

---

May I ask why you never use paragraph breaks and never credit the author? 

---

Originally posted by: Mark

---

I think he just uses cut and paste that's why the text is that way. 

---

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

---

Yeah that's what I presume but usually when one copy and pastes the formatting stays the same. The paragraph breaks in the article remain. It looks like he's actually deleting the paragraph breaks.

 

If he is copy and pasting the whole article in one go then he probably has to go through and delete all the extra text from ads and picture captions. 

 

Or maybe he is just copy and pasting one portion of the text at a time and then cramming it all together instead of using breaks. 

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

 You worry too much about format and ignore the content.

---

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas

---

Page breaks (and less of the piece) would interest me enough to read David's posting.  Too long like that one, not going to even try.

 

But, out of respect for David's efforts (for which he has equal rights to posting his side as Kevin does), at least David's are not full of Kevin's nothing-but-amatuerishly-rude overdone execration in his replies to David.   As much as Kevin says he hates Trump, it is surprising that he sinks to Trump's cringeworthy level.

 

But, some good 'tips' (for everyone) I've borrowed from a respected source regarding the posting/pasting (and interpreting) of social media as "news":

  

 - Be wary of coverage from blatantly partisan outlets.  Painting one side as good and the other as evil colors a piece as an "us versus them" narrative.  Situations aren't always as framed, e.g. a place "went out of business", when what actually occured is left out: "the owners closed the business and reopened a new successful one in the same [or different, or whatever] location."

 

 - If the writer's opinion is in a "news story", it's not a news story.  The writer inserting their own opinion should only happen in opinion/analysis pieces and be clearly marked as such.

 

 - Don't depend on social media for news.  People do share actually fact-checked news articles on social media, but they also share hot takes, hyperpartison caterwauling and straight up mis/disinformation.  Examples: Democratic Underground, (obvious), Daily Wire (right wing media company), Daily Mail (tabloid Conservative), Fox News (admittedly conservative), Facebook, etc. are not recommended as unbiased sources.   What is recommended is the editorial page of a respected state-wide newspaper with respected editorial writers of a balance of both liberal and conservative persuasions.

 

JMHO

 

Candy

 

 

---