Originally posted by: Mark
Esq. Tom shoulden't you be working on Trump's appellate brief?
As usual when liberals don't have a vaild response to facts they resort to snide remarks or insults.
Originally posted by: Mark
Esq. Tom shoulden't you be working on Trump's appellate brief?
As usual when liberals don't have a vaild response to facts they resort to snide remarks or insults.
Originally posted by: tom
As usual when liberals don't have a vaild response to facts they resort to snide remarks or insults.
Interesting. So Jerry, Sled and DM are all liberals? They do it too, or doesn't that count? Asking for a friend.
Originally posted by: tom
As usual when liberals don't have a vaild response to facts they resort to snide remarks or insults.
Here's my response, stupid Tom: USA Today isn't a Democratic party newsletter. And when an independent news organization decides on its own to print or not print an article, that's not censorship. Censorship is when an outside organization influences that news organization's decisions.
God, you're an idiot. And the bullshit you post barely merits a response. That's why we choose to laugh at you rather than take you or your nonsense seriously.
Now go back to telling us why your orange hero did nothing wrong and it was all a witch hunt blah blah blah.
Did I mention that you're a moron?
Originally posted by: tom
As usual when liberals don't have a vaild response to facts they resort to snide remarks or insults.
You brought up a totally unrelated topic in this thread. You got the response you deserved.
Tom like the entire Republican establishment isnt saying Trump didnt commit the crime. He's just smearing all the people involved with the verdict and the justice system itself.
Kinda like what they did with the last election.
Thats how my 8 year old nephew acts whenever he loses playing Battleship.
Originally posted by: tom
Speaking of censorship as one of the democratic party's newsletters cut an article after it approved it.
USA Today's recent debacle over its deleted op-ed penned by Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., is the latest in a series of bizarre editorial decisions made by the newspaper giant.
You think a private newspaper's editor, or editorial board, deciding not to run an opp ed submitted by a Republican Senator is "censorship"? I'm affairs you slept through that First Amendment class in law school.
USA Today is one of the democrat parties newsletters & only publishes democrat party dogma. So their decision not to publish a conservative opeinion piece is not unusual
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/usa-today-media-bias
Originally posted by: tom
USA Today is one of the democrat parties newsletters & only publishes democrat party dogma. So their decision not to publish a conservative opeinion piece is not unusual
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/usa-today-media-bias
Whether it is "unusual" was not your would-be point--and it was not censorship either.
By the way, Fox News only publishes Republican dogma--what's your point?
