In no uncertain terms she expresses what every sane American knew -- https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1392873589234942
In no uncertain terms she expresses what every sane American knew -- https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1392873589234942
Could you explain what you mean by your title please? I think you either have no idea what the phrase "in lieu" means, or you meant to say something completely different and had a typo.
Could you explain what you mean by your title please? I think you either have no idea what the phrase "in lieu" means, or you meant to say something completely different and had a typo.
Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW
Could you explain what you mean by your title please? I think you either have no idea what the phrase "in lieu" means, or you meant to say something completely different and had a typo.
LiveFreeNW - Two things (1) I appreciate you asking your question without attacking my intelligence, (2) I did use the wrong wording - it was a mistake I made when I should have said something like " With what....".
One reason why Mn is democrat.
In Mn a registered voter can "vouch" for up to 8 people who don't have the proper documentation. What could go wrong?
A registered voter from your precinct can go with you to the polling place to sign an oath confirming your address. This is known as 'vouching.' A registered voter can vouch for up to eight voters. You cannot vouch for others if someone vouched for you.
https://sos.mn.gov/elections-voting/register-to-vote/register-on-election-day/
Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW
Could you explain what you mean by your title please? I think you either have no idea what the phrase "in lieu" means, or you meant to say something completely different and had a typo.
David meant "in light of," but his English skills are shockingly poor and he really only cares about barfing out MAGA bullshit that he's copied from some bozo on Facebook, not about making sense.
The other basic grade-school error he made was that the word "that" doesn't belong in his thread title at all; the indicative word "what" already fulfills that function. He also has Trump Capitalization Syndrome, but that's not a grammar error.
Originally posted by: tom
One reason why Mn is democrat.
In Mn a registered voter can "vouch" for up to 8 people who don't have the proper documentation. What could go wrong?
A registered voter from your precinct can go with you to the polling place to sign an oath confirming your address. This is known as 'vouching.' A registered voter can vouch for up to eight voters. You cannot vouch for others if someone vouched for you.
https://sos.mn.gov/elections-voting/register-to-vote/register-on-election-day/
As a MAGA moron, you HATE the idea of people voting, because you know that smaller turnouts favor Republicans and larger turnouts favor Democrats.
The process of "vouching" CANNOT result in a non-citizen being able to register and vote. It allows people who don't have the otherwise needed ID to be able to vote when there isn't enough time for them to obtain it.
I'm sure your Tom-panties are twisted at the idea of state governments making it as easy as possible for citizens to vote. MAGA wants to make it as difficult as possible, which is why they shut down polling places and send thugs to the ones that remain open to stand there holding machine guns and scowling at people.
What could go "wrong"? Citizens who are entitled to vote will be able to vote. Horrors!!!!!
The process of "vouching" CANNOT result in a non-citizen being able to register and vote.
Actually it does; because a person's identity, address cannot be verified and are allowed to vote the same day they register which is election day
It allows people who don't have the otherwise needed ID to be able to vote when there isn't enough time for them to obtain it.
People have plenty of time to get an id. Aren't these people getting bills/bank statements at their alleged address?.
If they don't have the proper info, come back next year.
As usual kevin supports criminality
Originally posted by: tom
The process of "vouching" CANNOT result in a non-citizen being able to register and vote.
Actually it does; because a person's identity, address cannot be verified and are allowed to vote the same day they register which is election day
It allows people who don't have the otherwise needed ID to be able to vote when there isn't enough time for them to obtain it.
People have plenty of time to get an id. Aren't these people getting bills/bank statements at their alleged address?.
If they don't have the proper info, come back next year.
As usual kevin supports criminality
People who are citizens voting isn't "criminality"; it's them exercising their rights.
Where in any state constitution does it say that you have to have a bank account to be able to vote??
You're dead wrong about non-citizens being allowed to vote. Ballots are vetted and people who aren't citizens will have them discarded.
Of course, stupid fucking Tom, you subscribe to the MAGA delusion that there are trillions of non-citizens casting fraudulent votes.
Do you have the balls to answer this one simple question? You've weaseled away from it many times before.
Why in earth would anyone not entitled to vote commit at least five felonies to cast a fraudulent vote that will probably be invalidated anyway? What would they gain?
You can't answer that one...coward.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
David meant "in light of," but his English skills are shockingly poor and he really only cares about barfing out MAGA bullshit that he's copied from some bozo on Facebook, not about making sense.
The other basic grade-school error he made was that the word "that" doesn't belong in his thread title at all; the indicative word "what" already fulfills that function. He also has Trump Capitalization Syndrome, but that's not a grammar error.
LiveFree - this is an example of what I spoke of concerning you not attacking my intelligence - by the one person who always finds fault with myself and others whenever I/we make a mistake.