Well, the 100 mile border zone puts 2 out of 3 Americans in a quasi-constitutional free zone, which to me is a bit excessive and Portland is smack in the middle of that.
https://www.aclumaine.org/know-your-rights/100-mile-border-zone/
Well, the 100 mile border zone puts 2 out of 3 Americans in a quasi-constitutional free zone, which to me is a bit excessive and Portland is smack in the middle of that.
https://www.aclumaine.org/know-your-rights/100-mile-border-zone/
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Then why do you seem to be a fan of the Trumpers who attacked law enforcement officers on January 6?
I never said I was a "fan" - those are your words and they are untrue. If you have proof that I said what you claim, then produce it. -- By the way, what does your false accusation concerning what you said I did have to do with this post about an automobile being used to run down law enforcement officers?
Originally posted by: David Miller
I never said I was a "fan" - those are your words and they are untrue. If you have proof that I said what you claim, then produce it. -- By the way, what does your false accusation concerning what you said I did have to do with this post about an automobile being used to run down law enforcement officers?
Well, while instructing you on the use of evidence and logic might be a waste of time: If you are opposed to assaults on "law enforcement officers" in Portland, you might like to be opposed to attacks on law enforcement officers in Washington, DC. Of course unless your opposition to violence is dependent of whether the perpetrators are pro- or anti-Trump.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Well, while instructing you on the use of evidence and logic might be a waste of time: If you are opposed to assaults on "law enforcement officers" in Portland, you might like to be opposed to attacks on law enforcement officers in Washington, DC. Of course unless your opposition to violence is dependent of whether the perpetrators are pro- or anti-Trump.
Needless to say, you have no proof of what you claim I said. Secondly, I ask again, what does your reply have to do with a car being used to run over a law enforcemrnt officer? Try staying on the immediate topic and stop trying to divert the topic by bringing me into it with unsubstantiated claims about what I said and what my beliefs are.
Like I said, a waste of time.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Like I said, a waste of time.
Well and truthfully said - I agree, your post(s) here are a waste of time.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Well, while instructing you on the use of evidence and logic might be a waste of time: If you are opposed to assaults on "law enforcement officers" in Portland, you might like to be opposed to attacks on law enforcement officers in Washington, DC. Of course unless your opposition to violence is dependent of whether the perpetrators are pro- or anti-Trump.
As always when their is a police violence issue the democrats can only fall bck to a 6 year old riot but continues to ignore the more current police attacks.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced Thursday that ICE agents reported an "unprecedented increase" of 3,200% (66 attacks) in vehicular attacks over the past year, leading up to Wednesday’s incident in which an ICE officer shot and killed a driver during a protest in Minneapolis.
I'm glad you oppose violence--I'm sure you were highly critical of the pro-Trump violence on Jan 6? Please, refresh my memory on that. You do remember Trump saying "beat hell out of him, I'll pay for your lawyer," "we love the Jan 6 protestors", and his blanket pardon of all of them regardless of the details. I don't remember you condemning that, but, maybe I forgot your attack on him too. I personally oppose all political violence, not mitigated by the political leaning of the perpetrators. Do you? And your use of "the democrats [SIC]" assumes all "democrats" think alike--an over-generalization that serves your prejudice but, suffers from that assumption that all members of a group share exactly the same opinion.
Originally posted by: tom
As always when their is a police violence issue the democrats can only fall bck to a 6 year old riot but continues to ignore the more current police attacks.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced Thursday that ICE agents reported an "unprecedented increase" of 3,200% (66 attacks) in vehicular attacks over the past year, leading up to Wednesday’s incident in which an ICE officer shot and killed a driver during a protest in Minneapolis.
What a lovely Tom-stat! THIRTY TOO HUNDERT PROSENT! OOOOOOOOO!
Since a year ago, a murderous rapist wasn't in the White House, of COURSE there's been a huge increase in ICE killings!
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Like I said, a waste of time.
"Nice Miller" didn't last long! The nasty little MAGA propagandist is back.
Just as well. If David wasn't screaming at people and calling them LIAR LIAR LIARS, a rift in the space-time fabric of the universe might develop.