The corruption of the brain dead Biden DemocRAT administration is surfacing for all to see. https://www.facebook.com/reel/774702975374276
The corruption of the brain dead Biden DemocRAT administration is surfacing for all to see. https://www.facebook.com/reel/774702975374276
They can investigate it all they want it is another 🐂 💩 conspiracy.
Originally posted by: Mark
They can investigate it all they want it is another 🐂 💩 conspiracy.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? - or are you just that obtuse?
Nope, all of this was disclosed in the January 6th hearings and available in the transcript of those hearings for years. They have literally known about this shit for years and are pretending they are hearing it for the first time.
Their calls weren't listened in on they looked at their call logs. They were looking for the lying sacks of shit that conspired with Trump.
Republicans are just making this shit up because they desperately need to spin up a conspiracy theory to distract people from their failures and their unwavering support of pedos.
And predictably they can count on their trained monkeys, like David Miller, to repeat their conspiracy theories.
Nope, all of this was disclosed in the January 6th hearings and available in the transcript of those hearings for years
PROOF?
Originally posted by: tom
Nope, all of this was disclosed in the January 6th hearings and available in the transcript of those hearings for years
PROOF?
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/10/07/congress/josh-hawley-fbi-pam-bondi-testimony-00596258
Originally posted by: Mark
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/10/07/congress/josh-hawley-fbi-pam-bondi-testimony-00596258
Nothing about this being disclosed in the Jan 6th hearings
Originally posted by: tom
Nope, all of this was disclosed in the January 6th hearings and available in the transcript of those hearings for years
PROOF?
Dr. Tom, the king of "cherry picking," "confusing coincidence with causation", "over generalization" and virtually every other logical fallacy, is asking for "proof"? Now, that is rich.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Dr. Tom, the king of "cherry picking," "confusing coincidence with causation", "over generalization" and virtually every other logical fallacy, is asking for "proof"? Now, that is rich.
You commenting pretending to be knowledgeable is "rich".
Originally posted by: David Miller
You commenting pretending to be knowledgeable is "rich".
Well, sir, my level of knowledge is debatable, and you have a right to your opinion about that; however, the rules of logic and evidence are not debatable, and you have no right to a contrary opinion. Mr. Tom's posts are a virtual font of logical fallacies; they are an endless supply of what not to do. You, sir, would have won the contest for King of the Logical Fallacy, but you have given up any "pretense" of logic in your servile toading to a truly despicable person. Therefore, you were disqualified from consideration.
