Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
He did say precisely that about HIPPA and limitations on giving information, that he can give out information only to the extent that Trump gives him permission to do. Clearly that doctor was not comfortable the first time, on national TV, disclosing a POTUS' medical condition, being assaulted by that pack of wolves, the reporters.
There are provisions for disclosing a president's medical information without consent; in the event that a tranfer of power (office) is imminent, but only to a panel to consider, not the public. Maybe the condition is possibly permanent, as in a persistent vegetative state, or temporary, as in going in for heart surgery. Was power transfered when Reagan was shot? I can't remember. He did go in for surgery, general anesthesia and all. Almost intuitive that the VP would be deemed to be in power for the duration of surgery and until fully awake and return of decision making capacity.
The reporters want any detail to get credit for being the first to report. I almost laughed when a reported asked "what is his viral load?" Gimme a break.
BTW, Dex has many uses, not just in critical illnesses. I was given it for a case of poison ivy that all the usual stuff didn't work.
Candy, yes, power was transferred when Reagan was shot. Sort of. Al Haig famously declared that "everything was under control" and implied that he was assuming executive authority. Of course, Constitutionally, VP Bush was the de facto President until Reagan recovered.
There are multiple reasons why the public deserves transparency and HIPPA should not apply. At least eight Presidents outright lied to the country about their often serious medical conditions--FDR and JFK being prominent recent examples. If you want some interesting info on the concealed crisis that resulted in the five-month-long Edith Wilson presidency:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/woodrow-wilson-stroke
The thing is, "inability to discharge the duties and responsibilities of his office," as stated in Article II of the Constitution, is determined by...whom? If a disabled President orders his staff to conceal the gravity of his illness, or directs a "doctor" (as opposed to a doctor) to certify that he is in fine fettle, then who's going to say otherwise and invoke the Constitutional clause? Woodrow Wilson didn't want that to happen in 1919. I can see an obvious parallel in 2020.
That's why I think HIPPA should not apply. The President's health--even that of an insane, evil, incompetent jerkwad like Trump--is too important to be concealed from the public, even if he wants it to be. Projecting a false image of everything-is-just-swell is in fact highly dangerous for the country.