....And needs to be impeached and removed from the bench.
....And needs to be impeached and removed from the bench.
I guess judges dont have to recuse themselves from cases involving the person who appointed them to office?
Well, isn't that special ?!
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
I guess judges dont have to recuse themselves from cases involving the person who appointed them to office?
Well, isn't that special ?!
Believe it or not, they don't! And while recusal in such cases is routine, the professed doctrine is that judges, once appointed, are supposed to cast aside any obligations to the people who got them there. Thus, they can be impartial in cases like this.
*dry heave*
