Judge Jeanine Strikes Out Again

Damn,  despite Federal Prosecutors having a 99% indictment rate, Jeanine cannot even get an indictment against someone that made a death threat against Trump and double downed when the FBI interviewed her.

https://www.rawstory.com/nathalie-jones-jeanine-pirro-indictment/

She hasn't been on the job long, but in that short time she has made herself into a laughingstock over her incompetence.

Not to defend the judge, but based on the story linked to, I'd agree with her decision. 

What sane person would blatently announce, on those platforms, their actual intent (and plan?) to do what she described.  Waste of time and resources.   The woman needs psych eval and tx.

I suspect it isn't so easy to prove the validity and intent of a 'threat'.   Look at what is posted here in Kitchen Sink!  I won't name names.

Candy

Wanna bet that she gets an indictment on this lady?

The only question that's relevant is: is it against the law to describe a crime and state that you intend to commit it? I don't think so!

And I don't think a person making such a statement necessarily needs "psych eval." Dumb thing to do? Doubtless. But if we hauled away all the stupid people, there would be no MAGAs left.

I believe this is non-relevant to the poster's intent, which is to reflect poorly on the judge (as is indicated by the question) that she "couldn't get an indictment" from the Grand Jury?   

I'll assume the woman was questioned as to whether or not she had a plan, where this would take place, what bladed weapons does she possess and how would she encounter the president, who presumably has a contingent of Secret Service personnnel protecting him from a female brandishing bladed weapons, what training does she have to 'disembowel' a person and remove their trachea.   

I'll guess that there are hundreds if not thousands of looneys making threats on social media every day, especially regarding presidents, especially when this president is making news every day about what services he is cutting and who will suffer something such as job loss.

Do criminals broadcast their intent to commit a crime if they really mean it?

The tend to when they are mentally disturbed. Jeanine has gone 0-7 in her high profile cases. Compare that to the Federal standard of a 99% indictment rate. 

You believe that DC grand jury participants are unbiased vs Pirro, then?

Odd, why would the citizens of DC hold a grudge against the Trump administration?

But since when in sweet holy motherfucking American jurisprudence is it the job of a judge presiding over a grand jury to "get an indictment"? Aren't judges supposed to be neutral and unbiased? And isn't it the job of the PROSECUTOR to get an indictment?

I know what Mark really meant. Pirro, a slavish, drooling Trump lackey, appointed by the Turd to be his puppet, is no more a judge than she is a space shuttle pilot. But her job should be easy: see that whoever Trump sends her way gets crushed. She's evidently not able to do even that.

I expect the Turd to send the DC police to arrest the members of that grand jury. Maybe the Guard can help--there's only so much trash to collect.

It's now a federal crime to fail to worship Trump, let alone criticize him, and the institutions that protect free speech have been blotted out; so, we very soon won't have formalities like grand juries (or courts, or judges). We'll just have concentration camps and firing squads.

Oh, and isn't disemboweling someone and removing their trachea quite literally overkill? And she would get Trump all over her in the process. Ewwwww.

Yeah, "...disemboweling someone and removing their trachea..." is quite Ewwwwwie.  LOL.