Who needs a jury when we have Boilerman
Who needs a jury when we have Boilerman
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Only a dimwit doesn't know that this trial was crazy crooked and will be overturned. Some may be disbarred.
Like Rudy Guiliani, Kenneth Chesebro, and Michael Cohen? As well as John Eastman and Jenna Ellis having their law licenses suspended? Like those people?
Originally posted by: David Miller
You overlooked the fact that he is/was innocent of all fake, made up charges - but that is nothing new for you.
Yeah yeah yeah, every prosecution of Trump is a witch hunt, he's never committed a crime, it's all political, blah blah blah blah blah. Same old shit from David, our resident anal orifice.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Yeah yeah yeah, every prosecution of Trump is a witch hunt, he's never committed a crime, it's all political, blah blah blah blah blah. Same old shit from David, our resident anal orifice.
The most dangerous abuse of our system of justice is this last sham trial of a law no one can define, allegedly broken in a way heretofore never seen.Will the co-conspirators themselves be brought to justice? To do so would not be a matter of vengeance, but an important resolution of what was in fact the real election interference. Had Trump not triumphed in a landslide, these lawfare “dirty tricks” would have become the new normal by crooked Democrats going forward in every election cycle forever. These feckless connivers must be brought to task and face the musicNever mind that state law does not support a jail sentence under these circumstances. Forget that the district attorney deliberately contorted statutes and mangled evidence to pursue a meritless prosecution that was motivated purely by political vengeance. And ignore the fact that there is little chance that the biased jury’s guilty verdict, compounded by Merchan’s chronic reversible errors, will withstand judicial scrutiny on appeal. Eventually. It seems obvious that Merchan is desperate to stain Trump with the formal stricture of "convicted felon." To do it, he must sentence the incoming president. A jury’s verdict alone is insufficient under the law. Hence, the offer of what amounts to a non-sentence if only Trump will, at the very least, appear virtually during a hearing 10 days before he is sworn in. It is another charade meant to bookend —and cover-up— a sham trial. Show up to be verbally tarred and feathered, but no stocks or pillory will be deployed.That's all this ever was: a way to brand Trump a 'convicted felon' for crimes no one else has -- or will be -- prosecuted for. -https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2025/01/04/james-woods-abuse-of-our-justice-system-trump-trial-n2406122
OOOOOOH, "twitchy.com"!!!! An unimpeachable source!!!!
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
Like Rudy Guiliani, Kenneth Chesebro, and Michael Cohen? As well as John Eastman and Jenna Ellis having their law licenses suspended? Like those people?
Every lawyer Trump touches ends up bankrupt, jailed, disbarred or some combination of those three.