Originally posted by: Nines
Treatment is not mandatory right now with this new policy. You'll have to present a source backing your claim. They're requiring testing for those over 30, but testosterone treatment for low T outcomes is not mandatory currently. How / where is it published that he is making treatment ( testosterone supplements / replacement therapy) compulsory for those that test below some benchmark? And they sure won't dishonorably discharge them for having low T levels. That'd spur lawsuits galore for certain.
His initial announcement implied that there would be sanctions for those who tested deficient but refused therapy. Then another announcement implied that only those who had "adequate" testosterone levels would be considered for certain duties and assignments. His latest press release skipped over that issue altogether; his press goon was asked the question directly and evaded it.
Like so much in the Turd administration, there are unwritten rules and policies here. They probably don't want to outright say, "Don't get the testosterone and your career is over." But that's what it will be, functionally. And the military does and will discharge members who "Consistently refuse to maintain their personal health." (I'm paraphrasing from Army regulations that were previously used by the Turd administration to oust transgender service members.)
And where is this all coming from? RFK Jr.--who else? He scarfs testosterone. And we already know about his medical expertise (gag, barf).
The rhetoric from Hegseth suggests that the T-supplements will be mandatory for those who "need" them. I concur that current Army regulations don't say that. But I'm sure that anyone who refuses them will face some kind of punishment and/or exclusion, even if the policy doesn't become law. The Trump fascist military does what it wants to its members.