Kamala concedes election

Here's a checklist:

She called Trump and congratulated him on his victory

She promised a peaceful transfer of power

She promised to assist his team with the transition to the White House

No conspiracies about rigged voting machines, corrupt poll workers, or other BS

No angry mobs set to storm the Capital in January.

It almost seems unfair given how the scum on the other side play.   But I guess there is a small consolation prize in knowing one party respects the institutions of our Democracy even when they lose.     

Democrats have class and respect our country. Republicans don't.

Seems odd that biden didn;t make some of those statements, after all he is the president.  

Words.  Let's see the actions.  Based on the 2020 transition, it'll be open lawfare and impeachments and total made up stuff like the Steele Dossier.  There was zero 'peaceful transition of power' from the democrats in 2020.

If they just turn over the briefcase and the keys, I'll believe it. But that's not how the scum and deep state works.

He wasn't in the election, dumdum.

*Yeah but it would be Biden that would do these couple of items, right?  He is still President, correct?  

She promised a peaceful transfer of power

She promised to assist his team with the transition to the White House

*And it would be hard to question much when you lose by 15M votes as well.  To answer PJ.  

Since the popular vote, thanks to the Slavery College, is irrelevant, talking about how many popular votes you won or lost by is irrelevant, unless you want to reverse the results of the 2016 or 2000 elections.

Sorry, Jerry, but you and your gang don't get to pretend that Harris had infinite power and was therefore respnsible for everything in the last four years that you didn't like, and now say that she shouldn't assist with the peaceful transfer of power. See the contradiction???

And she's saying that as far as she's concerned, there will be no insurrection. Class, unlike Trumpf.

I didn't say this.....

that Harris had infinite power and was therefore respnsible for everything in the last four years that you didn't like

You and your MAGA gang have been saying it ever since she began her candidacy. For instance, "border czar" or "Harris inflation."

It's rankly stupid to ascribe ANY outcome to the actions of the most powerless person in high office in the entire US. A single Congressperson has far more power and influence on events.

It would seem to me that "transfer of power" (not a concession speech) would require the action be done by the "power" in office, which is still at this time President Biden, not the losing candidate, unless he is too ill to participate?  

Candy