Kamala Harris plagiarized nearly 80% of 2007 congressional testimony: report

Typical DemocRat tactic - she learned from brain dead Biden -- Vice President Kamala Harris is facing new allegations of plagiarism, this time tied to her 2007 congressional testimony on the John R. Justice Prosecutors and Defenders Incentive Act. Harris allegedly copied significant portions of her testimony from a Republican district attorney, raising further questions about her integrity and credibility. Key Details: Harris is accused of lifting nearly 80% of her 2007 testimony on a student loan repayment bill from Republican district attorney Paul Logli, who delivered similar remarks two months prior. The testimonies share identical language, surveys, and even typographical errors, with Harris’ version presented to the House Judiciary Committee, while Logli had addressed the Senate Judiciary Committee. This new accusation comes on the heels of prior plagiarism claims, including a report last week that Harris copied material from Wikipedia and NBC News in her 2009 book, Smart on Crime. https://mxmnews.com/article/2d379233-e01b-4696-91b9-33530baf4e60

"Copied significant portions" is NOT the definition of plagiarism and there's nothing unethical about it. 

 

Here's your assignment, David. Why don't you look up the definition of plagiarism.

Originally posted by: David Miller

Typical DemocRat tactic - she learned from brain dead Biden -- Vice President Kamala Harris is facing new allegations of plagiarism, this time tied to her 2007 congressional testimony on the John R. Justice Prosecutors and Defenders Incentive Act. Harris allegedly copied significant portions of her testimony from a Republican district attorney, raising further questions about her integrity and credibility. Key Details: Harris is accused of lifting nearly 80% of her 2007 testimony on a student loan repayment bill from Republican district attorney Paul Logli, who delivered similar remarks two months prior. The testimonies share identical language, surveys, and even typographical errors, with Harris’ version presented to the House Judiciary Committee, while Logli had addressed the Senate Judiciary Committee. This new accusation comes on the heels of prior plagiarism claims, including a report last week that Harris copied material from Wikipedia and NBC News in her 2009 book, Smart on Crime. https://mxmnews.com/article/2d379233-e01b-4696-91b9-33530baf4e60


pla·gia·rism /ˈplājəˌriz(ə)m/ noun the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.

Originally posted by: David Miller

pla·gia·rism /ˈplājəˌriz(ə)m/ noun the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.


Thank you David. Now read the last six words of what you just posted. Cheers!


 Apparently there are some who have trouble with comprehension, to wit -- a person who take's someones elses work or their ideas and then passes the work and/or ideas as their own is guilty of plagiarism. To be even more clear, anyone doing so is a thief and a liar. Plagiarism can also be considered a felony under certain state and federal laws. For example, if a plagiarist copies and earns more than $2,500 from copyrighted material, he or she may face up to $250,000 in fines and up to ten years in jail. Most corporations and institutions will not tolerate any form of plagiarism.

Edited on Oct 22, 2024 10:32am
Originally posted by: David Miller

 Apparently there are some who have trouble with comprehension, to wit -- a person who take's someones elses work or their ideas and then passes the work and/or ideas as their own is guilty of plagiarism. To be even more clear, anyone doing so is a thief and a liar. Plagiarism can also be considered a felony under certain state and federal laws. For example, if a plagiarist copies and earns more than $2,500 from copyrighted material, he or she may face up to $250,000 in fines and up to ten years in jail. Most corporations and institutions will not tolerate any form of plagiarism.


Want to hear something ironic, David. You just committed plagiarism by quoting a passage - and it doesn't matter whether it's one paragraph or a thousand - without attribution to the original author. 

 

Now that's your hint, David. Kamala Harris did this one weird trick that made it so that it wasn't plagiarism. What do you think it was??

Millerscum is full of shit on this one, and he knows it, but he lacks the balls to admit it.

David, don't run away now. We are making progress. We've already established that you ironically just committed plagiarism. 

 

And now you just have to figure out that one weird trick that made it so that Kamala 

 Harris did not in fact commit plagiarism.

 

Hint: it rhymes with Rattribution.

 

Come on David, you can do it!

David's orange master has plagiarized Hitler several times. David should be outraged!

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now