The Kevin's of the world will tell us that this isn't happening, but we all know that it's a lie. Libs being punks.
The Kevin's of the world will tell us that this isn't happening, but we all know that it's a lie. Libs being punks.
"Kevin's" should not have an apostrophe. Idiot.
Yet Kevin supports those attempting to intimidate. He now wants to discuss punctuation.
It is against the law to protest in front of a judges home.
More importantly Boiler - how are you feeling?
Oooo..they wrote stuff in chalk on the street. Thats almost the same as Jan 6.
Let me know when Democrat Leaders rile up a mob and send them into storm the Supreme Court building.
Republican punks aren't just the inbreeders with MAGA hats - they're the members of Congress and previous White House that feed them their mission statement.
It is not illegal to protest in front of a Judge's home. Why would it be? In fact, it is the free speech conservatives profess to love. My two cents is these extremist radical judges should face protests for the rest of their days. They should be shunned whenever they go out in public.
So what if it makes them uncomfortable? They have no problem forcing women to give birth to their rapists' babies. I'd say that is a tad more uncomfortable than facing public criticism.
Boiler and Tom are suffering from the same delusion that Ted Cruz is.
Originally posted by: tom
It is against the law to protest in front of a judges home.
More importantly Boiler - how are you feeling?
Wrong-o, stupid Tommie-poo. God, you're an idiot.
It is not illegal to protest in front of a Judge's home.
The Wash Post agrees tht it is illegal
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/11/protest-justice-home-illegal/
For those to lazy to read
At issue is a statute enacted in 1950: Title 18, Section 1507, of the U.S. Code. The law states that it is illegal, “with the intent of influencing any judge,” to: picket or parade “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” “or with such intent,” to resort “to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence”
Stupid Tommie-poo, even if what you "report" is 100% accurate, the protestors had no intent of "influencing" the judge.
Stupid Tommie-poo.
