Law and order, Texas style.

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/04/13/daniel-perry-pardon-greg-abbott/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Missing in the article is the fact that the man Perry shot was aiming a rifle at him

Originally posted by: tom

Missing in the article is the fact that the man Perry shot was aiming a rifle at him


It's missing because it wasn't a ''fact''. 

It was what the murderer claimed and was refuted by eyewitnesses.

What about the real fact that the murderer was a racist and wanted to shoot people?

 

Anything else you need help with?

It's missing because it wasn't a ''fact''. It was what the murderer claimed and was refuted by eyewitnesses.

The eyewitnesses that were participating in the riot?

 

What about the real fact that the murderer was a racist

Proof?  He shot a whte person

 

and wanted to shoot people?

 

He was working & driving his Uber

 

If granted a new trial, Perry’s defense team intends to show a video of Foster where he admitted he carried an AK-47 to “intimidate puss–s who did not share his beliefs,” the filing states.

 

This was not allowed in the trial

 

three other incidents where Foster stopped cars on the public streets by using his girlfriend’s wheelchair. The cars were then swarmed by protesters who would terrorize the drivers or chase after the vehicles.

 

A police report that called Perry’s action “self-defense” and labeled the shooting a “justified homicide” was also not allowed to be seen in court.

 

 


Originally posted by: tom

It's missing because it wasn't a ''fact''. It was what the murderer claimed and was refuted by eyewitnesses.

The eyewitnesses that were participating in the riot?

 

What about the real fact that the murderer was a racist

Proof?  He shot a whte person

 

and wanted to shoot people?

 

He was working & driving his Uber

 

If granted a new trial, Perry’s defense team intends to show a video of Foster where he admitted he carried an AK-47 to “intimidate puss–s who did not share his beliefs,” the filing states.

 

This was not allowed in the trial

 

three other incidents where Foster stopped cars on the public streets by using his girlfriend’s wheelchair. The cars were then swarmed by protesters who would terrorize the drivers or chase after the vehicles.

 

A police report that called Perry’s action “self-defense” and labeled the shooting a “justified homicide” was also not allowed to be seen in court.

 

 


Bottomless Pinocchio!  Are you drifting in dementia?  

Originally posted by: Dealer1

Bottomless Pinocchio!  Are you drifting in dementia?  


Those are facts, dealer is welcome to refute any of the above

Tom, you really need to learn how to post a URL on this board.   The fact you havent figured that out after how many years  posting here?   Kinda makes it awkward when you judge other peoples' mental competency.

Tom needs to learn how to think first. His fact-finding consists of scraping the bottom of the internet until he finds something that looks good to him.

Originally posted by: tom

It's missing because it wasn't a ''fact''. It was what the murderer claimed and was refuted by eyewitnesses.

The eyewitnesses that were participating in the riot?

 

What about the real fact that the murderer was a racist

Proof?  He shot a whte person

 

and wanted to shoot people?

 

He was working & driving his Uber

 

If granted a new trial, Perry’s defense team intends to show a video of Foster where he admitted he carried an AK-47 to “intimidate puss–s who did not share his beliefs,” the filing states.

 

This was not allowed in the trial

 

three other incidents where Foster stopped cars on the public streets by using his girlfriend’s wheelchair. The cars were then swarmed by protesters who would terrorize the drivers or chase after the vehicles.

 

A police report that called Perry’s action “self-defense” and labeled the shooting a “justified homicide” was also not allowed to be seen in court.

 

 


The eyewitnesses that were participating in the riot?

 

It was a rally, idiot. Your hero escelated it by running a red light and driving towards the crowd.

 

Proof? He shot a whte person

 

Your hero posted on social media his hatred of Muslims and admitted ''I am a racist''.

 

three other incidents where Foster stopped cars on the public streets by using his girlfriend’s wheelchair. The cars were then swarmed by protesters who would terrorize the drivers or chase after the vehicles. A police report that called Perry’s action “self-defense” and labeled the shooting a “justified homicide” was also not allowed to be seen in court.

 

Heresay.

 

Fact. Your hero killed someone and was convicted by a jury of his peers.

 

 

Anything else you need help with?

 

 

He posted on his social media account before the murder "I might have to kill someone".

And then he did.     

And a jury of his peers examined all of the evidence and found him guilty.

 

And then Tucker Carlson said the victim deserved it and the governor of Texas was a pussy for not pardoning him..   So the governor is now seeking to pardon him.    Wouldnt want to upset Tucker now would we?   

 

Remember when Hillary called the alt-right "deplorable" and they all shit their pants?  She was being generous.

 

  

 

 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now