Let's vote! Two threads started per day limit

 Lewis, you are the biggest abuser using ad himinem attacks here in the Forums. There isn't a poster who did not agree 100% with your morinic postings that you have not called names and attacked. In this topic here you have called Jerry an asshole, Tom a Trump-kisser and made me the target of your thread - all because we do not agree with your thinking. In the trip reports section of the forums, you refer to a host as a "lying bastard ". You have verbally attacked Tom, Charles,myself and multiple others continuously over the past months and years. Looking at the last 4 pages of postings just here in the Sink,you have had the last word on all of the topics - 40 in all - except for 9 of the topics. You are under the impression that you and you alone know and have the answers for almost everything here in the Sink. Your filth, attacks and verbal abuse never stops. You have run off numerous others who used to post here in the Sink, many who complained in the Questions to the Staff portion of the Forums, to no avail. 

I think the personal attacks are much worse than the number of treads started.  Can we limit the personal attacks to one a day.  We can all choose to ignor a tread we have no intrest in .  

So are you telling us that you never do that? Because "You too! You too!" is your go-to weasel tactic whenever you get called out for something.

And you're a LIAR LIAR LIAR when you say I "have the last word," because anyone is free to continue any discussion with a post of their own.

I'm afraid I can't give any credence to your faux outrage when you constantly, and by constantly I mean dozens of times a day, disparage and insult people. Furthermore, you post crap that you know is lies. So you have no right to complain. You're like a pedo rapist complaining about somebody else's jaywalking. I I use that specific analogy because you worship a man who is a self-professed pedo and has raped at least thirteen women. That's utterly disgusting and reflects poorly on your character.

But y'know what? I didn't say that you should be muzzled or even limited in your posts. I said that EVERYONE should be limited in the number of threads they start. You post endless streams of stupid, evil garbage that among other wrongs, continually support the horrid rapist, thief, traitor, and utter asshole whom you've made your hero. That's quite aside from your awful manner and general repulsiveness. 

I also should note that unlike everyone else here, your sole purpose is to start arguments. You shy away from honest and civil discussion the way a cockroach scurries away from the light.

So since you didn't answer the question, I'll just presume that your opinion is, "I wanna start twenty threads a day and you can't make me stop, waaah waaah waaah waaah waaah." Duly noted. You will certainly reply--with the insults that you pretend to disapprove of --but our dialogue here is over. 

I will continue to refute every lie that you post, and I will call you what you are, which is a horrible, dishonorable, dishonest little man.

Have a nice day 😃!

I would be completely willing to limit them to zero if David did the same. But that would have to include attacks on groups--liberals, Democrats, immigrants, members of a given race or nation, people who vote one way or the other, members of certain professions...

However, you were referring to personal attacks specifically, so I'll say that I have offered David a "truce" at least five times that I recall, and he never managed even 24 hours before he broke it. Nonetheless, I'd be willing to try again. That said, a personal attack/insult on a group that a poster is obviously a part of as a way to do-si-do around such a restriction is something that David loves to do and I would consider as a violation of such a truce.

All this is why I don't support muzzling him or any other poster. He's a dishonorable man and a liar of the worst kind, so any agreement of any kind with him is worthless, as he is himself, but he has the right to post what he wants on existing threads and start a reasonable number of threads of his own...as do we all. If we initiated a personal attack limit, that would be pretty much blotting David out completely. I mean, imagine him only being able to post ONE personal insult a day! He'd go batshit crazy!

And remember, the more we keep him occupied here, the safer the kids in his neighborhood are.

I say one free one a day.  Calling Trump a turd is one, calling David scum is 2,  Calling Biden brain dead is one, callinf Kevin a liar would be two and so on.  There is really no need for any of it

I was thinking of it as LVA being the message board "forum" and the different categories are sub forums. 

The term use to be relatively common with older message boards and websites. 

That would have to be quite the complex scoring system, and given the shit that gets said here, the list would be dozens of pages long. And yes, I freely admit that I say a lot of it. It's mostly because I loathe the fawning support for the turd, er, Noble Dear Leader who is ruining the country that I love, and the endless excuses and justification for his awful behavior and grossly stupid and harmful policies. He's evil. Period. So I have contempt for those who support and defend him.

I think it's beside the point that there's "no need for it." There's no need for these forums or for the entirety of LVA, for that matter. We would all, with the exception of David and Tom, like to see nothing but civil discussion. But here's the thing. I consider David's relentless posting of utter bullshit MAGA propaganda copied from some Facebook rando to be inherently uncivil. It's meant to start arguments. Would you disagree?

Yeah, but LVA uses "Forums" to refer to this section of their website, so I assume we're, at this moment, in one of many forums. 

Having special rules for the Sink isn't unprecedented. I could see there being informal rules for most of the other forums as well, such as conforming to the forum title (post dining reviews under Dining, that sort of thing, and by extension, don't post hotel or gambling reviews there).

How about ending the KS altogether

That is certainly an option.