Let's vote! Two threads started per day limit

He disagrees with everyone who doesn't share his evil MAGA obsessions. And he is indeed usually quite nasty, whether he uses what you call "foul language" or not. And for the record, I consider calling people "liars," "delusional," and "ignorant" to be extremely foul language. He does that to everybody; yes, even you. You're lucky if you haven't read those responses.

But enough about that worthless asshole.

kevin's multiple 3am rants are a perfect example of why the KS should be shut down

 The Sink is not the problem. Prior to Lewis's appearance in the Sink, the Sink was a place for congenial postings that contained few political postings. There were many others who posted in the Sink but left when the political hatred, foul language, personal insults and negativity became mainstream, never to post here again. 

Yes. They couldn't stand Miller's nastiness, flooding the Sink with slobbering Facebook crap, and personal attacks and insults on anyone who dared to disagree with him.

Tom's petty little personal attacks are a perfect example of why he should be shut down.

Kevin said David Miller starts 10+ new threads every day (see the initial post of this thread).

Anyone can gather this data, who starts each thread, from the Topics title page. 

In the interest of accuracy, I did a count from 2/1 through 2/27.

David Miller started 2 new threads each day of that period except on 2/18 and 2/22.  David started 3 threads on each of those two days.

On 2/22 Kevin suggested that each poster be limited to no more than 2 new threads each day.

By way of my February count, even prior to that suggestion on 2/22, David had only started 2 threads a day in this month except on the 2 days when he started 3 threads. 

Even if I miscounted (it is rather tedious to do this), overall David Miller mostly started 2 threads each day even prior to Kevin's suggestion.

As if I have nothing else to do.  But when somebody is accused of something, particularly something with retrievable intel, I like to follow up to prove or disprove.  Sorry, Kevin.

Candy

Candy, I'm disappointed in you. I didn't say that he was doing that currently. I said that the issue arose PREVIOUSLY when Miller was indeed starting that many threads a day. Anthony disciplined him and barred him from starting ANY threads for two weeks. After that, he did dial it back somewhat. But since his privileges were reinstated, he's been gradually upping his daily thread starting count.

By counting his thread starts SINCE he was disciplined, you're doing what Tom loves to do: cherry,-picking data.

The first sentence of your post is incorrect. I suggest you reread it and then compare it to what I actually said in my initial post.

I'm puzzled that you've become such a passionate David Miller advocate. I can only surmise that you're getting back at me for criticizing religion. 

And you seem like a nice person, so your taking the side of such an utter jerkass, who has called you "delusional," "ignorant," etc. etc. is kind of surprising.

 Thank you Candy for taking the time to check Lewis's claims. My present self - imposed goal is to post no more than 2 threads a day. I have tried to adhear to that quota and will continue to do so in the future. There will be some days I may not post any new threads. I do thusly because of the past comments and action taken against me concerning the number of daily threads I was making in the past - which, now that I look back, were excessive. 

Miller started three threads on one recent date. But he's entitled to return to his old habits if he wants.

I did NOT claim that Miller was NOW posting excessively. I stated that his recent activity suggested that he was increasing his thread origination now that his disciplinary period was over. His goal appears to be to test the waters and watch for reactions, eventually to return to his massive thread diarrhea habits. He appeared to have been stimulated by Trump's recent antics.

But if his self-professed, self-imposed quota is genuine and he does "adhesr" to it (LOL), I'm sure everyone would be both gobsmacked and pleasantly surprised. I certainly would.

I honestly thank Miller for trying to rein it in, if that's what he's doing. But y'know, him calling me "mentally sick" for DARING to disagree with him suggests that the new Miller is the same as the old Miller.

Since his suspension his average is probably two a day. The most I remember him starting in any one day since the suspension was three. 

Something you keep leaving out is Anthony kind of sort of admonished you at the same time. He stated that you are just as close to getting banned as he is. 

Intead of presuming Candy is being bias against you maybe you should take a moment of self-reflection and consider how your style of commenting can make you appear. 

The way you make comments often about certain posters on the forum and sometimes comments in general make you look like you're trying to out asshole whoever you precieve as an asshole. 

Candy has already explained to you that she has nothing personal against you for your view on religion. You're deflecting and avoiding the self-reflection you might want to take a moment to make. 

You and Miller have a history and you clearly have hatred. That hatred seems to have consumed your entire personality on this forum. That hatred has begun to blind you and affect your thinking. 

Both you and Miller need to get over yourselves. You are both starting to make the whole site look bad and probably turn off new members. 

Consider for a moment that everything you say on the forum reflects on LVA as a whole. How do you want LVA to be perceived by potential new members? 

It is only a matter of time before Anthony decides you are both more trouble than you're worth and bans you both.