The LVRJ editorial staff loses its mind

Mark, I'm well on to Kevin's tasteless use of context to make his point.  If acceptable to the LVA heads, then I needn't stress over it.  Stephen Foster used the D word in "Old Folks at Home" and other songs, most having been revised/substituted, since it is generally considered racially offensive.  BTW, did Trump really say "no good xxxxx bitches?"  In public?

I don't know if he said it or not, but I know he has said a lot worse in public. Plus, it is kind of hard not to speak in vulgar terms these days because the President does it several times a day. Twitter had to make a special rule for him, so he could continue to spew his daily vulgarities. 

Edited on Sep 14, 2019 5:17pm

There's your problem, and probably Kevin's--social media overload.  Suggestion:  Unplug.  Read the Wall Street Journal or NY Times for news of the day.  I believe they cannot print vulgarities.

Originally posted by: Candy Wright

There's your problem, and probably Kevin's--social media overload.  Suggestion:  Unplug.  Read the Wall Street Journal or NY Times for news of the day.  I believe they cannot print vulgarities.


From today's NY Times:

 

We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. 

When one is confronted daily with vulgar acts commited by Trump and Tump's clan, it is hard not to discuss the day's news in vulgar terms. 

 

 


The hypocrisy of our resident Trumpers being "outraged" at my use of vulgar language boggles the mind. Where's your sanctimonious outrage been the last two years re Trump?

"We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student." 

 

It turns out that another mark scoop is wrong.  The alleged victim doesn't remember it happening & Stier is a clinton hack.

 

The fake story didn't stop the democratic candidates from calling for his impeachment

Originally posted by: tom

"We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student." 

 

It turns out that another mark scoop is wrong.  The alleged victim doesn't remember it happening & Stier is a clinton hack.

 

The fake story didn't stop the democratic candidates from calling for his impeachment


Tom, let me gently explain to you--the allegation came during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings. Therefore, he couldn't have been impeached then--he wasn't in office. This most recent story simply confirms the previous allegation. Your statement that Democrats called for his impeachment is therefore a LIE. You're LYING.

 

And yeah, whenever anyone accuses a Republican of anything, it's all FAKE NOOZE and whoever makes the accusation is a "Clinton hack." After all, you MUST be a Democrat if you say anything negative about Kavanaugh!

Of course, DemocRats never lie or distort the truth. And they are so good at governing - just look at the fine jobs they have done in Detroit, New York, Los Angelas, Chicago, and San Francisco. 

Even MSNBC & the Wash Post have admitted that this is a discredited story.  The NY Times has admitted the following;

 

"The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

 

The lawyer, Max Stier, did not actually provide his account directly; the Times acknowledged that "two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier" had relayed his supposed version of events."

Business as usual for the lying DemocRats.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now