Originally posted by: Roger S
Why shouldn't someone who is accused of a crime be "turned loose"? They haven't been convicted of anything yet, so how do you justify preemptively punishing them?
Keep in mind that bail isn't supposed to be punitive; it's meant to assure that the accused shows up for trial.
I vote according to whether a candidate supports fundamental human rights--for EVERYBODY. So anyone pontificating that people accused of crimes should be treated as if they were automatically guilty wouldn't get my vote.
These are your words Kevin
Don't be obtuse. Judges have two metrics to use when granting or not granting bail: flight risk and danger to others. Joe Hammer was judged to be both.
Someone who is deemed to be neither a flight risk nor a public danger should not and cannot be charged excessive bail.
Understand? I doubt it.