[MAGA Trigger Warning] New Leaked Intelligence Also Shows Trump Lied About Iranian Attack

Well, this never gets old. The MAGAs here have been telling us that Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear program was "totally obliterated" was more trustworthy than the assessment that was put together by his own intelligence experts at the DOD. 

I am happy to tell Charles, David, Boiler, Tom and the other MAGAs that Trump has chumped them once again.

The United States obtained intercepted communication between senior Iranian officials discussing this month’s U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program and remarking that the attack was less devastating than they had expected... 

The communication, intended to be private, included Iranian government officials speculating as to why the strikes directed by President Donald Trump were not as destructive and extensive as they had anticipated, these people said.

You would think our resident Trump stooges would be tired of getting lied to but I guess it is ok when their "Daddy" lies to them. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/06/29/trump-iran-nuclear-damage-intercepted-call/

Look Charles, David, Boiler and Tom are already in position for "daddy". 

       And, of course, Mark believes what the Iranains are saying....

Very much so as these were private conversations among themselves that they didn't know were monitored.

And once again, Mark likely fell for an anonymously sourced, leaked partisan hit piece.  Just like he believed the Hillary Clinton campaign's Steele Dossier, thought there were Trump Golden Shower Tapes, and bought the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation story.   

Let's see a transcript of this alleged conversation.  Who were the participants?  Did the press get a full report or just bits and pieces?  Like every other time they have been duped, it will get front-page coverage for a few days, and then maybe proven false or inconsequential, and no one will ever admit they were wrong.

In this case, it sounds suspiciously like reporting of intercepts from just after the attack.  Israeli intelligence concluded that Iran’s military leadership was telling Iran’s political leadership the bombings only set them back a few months. But Iran’s military believed they had been set back years.  Sounds like recycled news to hurt Trump.  

The bottom line is that a single phone call between unnamed Iranians is not the same as an intelligence assessment, which takes into account a body of evidence, with multiple sources and methods.  Maybe these Iranians (whoever they are) suspected they were being listened to and were pulling a little disinformation of their own.  Why wouldn't they suspect they were tapped since their top scientists and generals all ended up getting whacked?  We won't know for sure until someone sifts through the rubble.  

But if it's a hit piece against Trump, you can bet the crew here will buy it..  Because they hate Trump.  And yes.  You can argue that I am biased toward believing our CIA, DNI,  Secretary of Defense, Israeli intelligence, and many others in this scientific space over an anonymously sourced, leaked, single phone conversation between unknown Iranians.   I'm ok with that.

Because the anonymous leaker says so?

Golly, just a few days ago, weren't you saying the anonymous leakers couldn't be trusted over the report? You saw how that turned out? The Trump administration had to admit it was the real deal.  Now, these same leakers leak more intelligence, and you say they can't be trusted again? 

Odd how anonymous leakers have a better track record than your daddy. A halfway intelligent person would get tired of being lied to over and over again. 

The UN Nuclear watchdog just put this out. 

"They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that." 

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/29/nx-s1-5450282/u-n-nuclear-watchdog-says-iran-could-enrich-uranium-again-in-a-matter-of-months

Time to assume the position for Daddy Trump. 

Angry Charles doesn't want to believe whatever information contradicts his preconceived ideas. BUT...he will swallow whatever Trump feeds him, even with the flimsiest of proof...or no proof at all.

I guess I still don't understand it. How could any rational person, MAGA or otherwise, utterly believe every single thing the Turd says? Even a toddler could tell that he's a habitual liar.

But angry Charles isn't as smart as a toddler...so he happily assumes the position.

Does Trump get mad when you ask him to use lube, Charles?

Annonymous sources??   Or Election denier John Ratcliffe?  Hmmmm....

I think I'll just wait until more facts become well reported.