Especially when its to protect your state from Climate Change which Texans dont believe in.
Pj might want to check with the UN on this topic
Especially when its to protect your state from Climate Change which Texans dont believe in.
Pj might want to check with the UN on this topic
Originally posted by: tom
Especially when its to protect your state from Climate Change which Texans dont believe in.
Pj might want to check with the UN on this topic
The UN is not taking 35 Billion from US tax payers to defend against something they say doesnt exist.
Texas is.
Thats 35 Billion more than Mamdami took from US taxpayers for his horrible, awful, Venezeuala program to help single moms with their kids.
Originally posted by: tom
Public pension underfunding: In government-run plans, underfunding can trigger legal consequences such as fines, increased oversight, and even restrictions on plan amendments or lump-sum payouts under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
You would think Mark would be capable of reading the paragraph above his post.
And federal law doesn't necessarily "trump" local law.
Stupid kevin is unaware of the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution.
NYC receives $9B in funding from the federal govt plus another $8B for the MTA
ALSO
In 2024, the City received approximately $7.2 billion in federal assistance from major housing and homelessness programs through a combination of direct funding and tax expenditures. - NYU
so much for pj's claim of NY self sufficiency.
And stupid Tom is unaware of the Constitutional clause reserving all powers not specifically named in the Constitution as belonging to the federal government to the states.
The Constitution does not mention federal control over state pension funds. And ERISA refers only to private pensions. So lawless stupid Tom should know better.
NYC, like any city, receives federal assistance. It also pays a huge amount in taxes. Stupid Tom yeeps about the former but of course, ignores the latter.
Stupid, lying Tom.
Originally posted by: tom
Especially when its to protect your state from Climate Change which Texans dont believe in.
Pj might want to check with the UN on this topic
The UN knows what Texans think and believe?
Stupid Tom.
The IPCC has published a new generation of climate scenarios – and buried in the fine print is a remarkable concession: the extreme warming pathways that dominated climate research, policy, and media coverage for decades were never actually plausible. It took a while to notice because almost no one in mainstream media bothered to report it. “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the next generation of climate scenarios,” Science policy analyst Roger Pielke Jr. wrote, calling it “big news” that “eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades.”
Public pension underfunding: In government-run plans, underfunding can trigger legal consequences such as fines, increased oversight, and even restrictions on plan amendments or lump-sum payouts under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
3rd time posting this, stupid kevin can't read.
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding” (Congress.gov, Constitution Annotated). This clause ensures that federal law overrides any conflicting state law. - Congress.gov
Originally posted by: tom
Public pension underfunding: In government-run plans, underfunding can trigger legal consequences such as fines, increased oversight, and even restrictions on plan amendments or lump-sum payouts under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
3rd time posting this, stupid kevin can't read.
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding” (Congress.gov, Constitution Annotated). This clause ensures that federal law overrides any conflicting state law. - Congress.gov
Wow...you're proving my point so brilliantly! "Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
Keep digging! 😆😆😆😆😆
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Wow...you're proving my point so brilliantly! "Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
Keep digging! 😆😆😆😆😆
This clause ensures that federal law overrides any conflicting state law. - Congress.gov
You are truly stupid
Originally posted by: tom
This clause ensures that federal law overrides any conflicting state law. - Congress.gov
You are truly stupid
That statement by Congress.gov directly contradicts the Constitutional clause that they cite.
I know you went rummaging around the Internet until you found something that "proved" your point. That's easy to do.
Now, rummage around and find the clause in the Constitution that states that all powers not specifically given to the federal government are reserved for the States and the people.
Or don't do that, and remain stupid Tom.
