Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Here's the truth - its the same system we've had for 40 years and it was never a problem until they told a story the Orange turd didnt want to hear.
The FED doesnt make policy one any one month of data. And stopping the reports (which is what the new dipshit wants) doesnt improve the problem you are complaining about. Nobody including you has put together a better method. THis is just catering to president crybaby who doesnt want to hear the Emperor has no clothes.
The litle green men bullshit is getting really old.
Jobs revisions from the last 10 years
So PJ doesn't believe the largest monthly revisions in 50 years are a problem. He doesn't think the Fed looks at those monthly numbers, even though employment is one of its only two objectives. He doesn't think the unprecedented 800,000 downward revision for 2024 is an issue. He doesn't see that these reports have been getting far worse for 3 years.
This is an issue with models or methodology or assumptions that need to change, and the bureaucrats haven't changed the process.... because 'It's the same system we've had for 40 years and it always used to work ' A lot of stuff worked 40 years ago that doesn't work very well today. And of course, we'd be far better off without publishing grossly inaccurate monthly reports just to revise them by 90% a month later. What good does an employment report off by 90% do anyone? It does more harm than good. We'd be far better off just using the ADP numbers now.
And until they fix their methods, they need to stop this bullshit monthly report and just publish a far more accurate Quarterly report that already has the first 2 months' revisions. Or publish the more accurate Monthly 60 days after the month-end. You'd have to be stupid to want grossly inaccurate reports published just because it's the way it's been done for 40 years. Oh wait. Maybe I'm on to something.