looks like one of the Fab Four has some splain’ to do! And I was always lead to believe that only happens in the deep Appalicia? Sorry DD no offense to you.
Edited on Jul 18, 2019 7:41pm
looks like one of the Fab Four has some splain’ to do! And I was always lead to believe that only happens in the deep Appalicia? Sorry DD no offense to you.
Another crackpot conspiracy theory served up by desperate conservatives to cover up their racism.
See:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-the-ilhan-omar-marriage-smear-went-from-an-anonymous-post-on-an-obscure-forum-to-being-embraced-by-trump
Isn't the Daily Beast the organization who lied to us, for two years mind you, that Trump colluded with Russia? Mark, please correct me if I'm wrong. Once someone lies to me several times, I put no stock in the further words. I guess that could be considered profiling.
Originally posted by: Mark
Another crackpot conspiracy theory served up by desperate conservatives to cover up their racism.
See:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-the-ilhan-omar-marriage-smear-went-from-an-anonymous-post-on-an-obscure-forum-to-being-embraced-by-trump
“Desperate conservatives” not thinking that conservatives are the “desperate” ones!
There ain't no reason for rdwoodpecker to apologize to poor old DonDiego.
Why sometimes them brother/sister arrangements work out perty good. Fr'instance the Pharaoh Tutankhamen, . . . umm, perhaps that is a bad example.
And poor old DonDiego has read that, f'rinstance, female fruit flies prefer mating with their brothers.
Ref: Drosophila Melanogaster
[By the way, . . . Appalachia is spelled: A-p-p-a-l-a-c-h-i-a. But don't be too concerned; fruit flies ain't good spellers either.]
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Isn't the Daily Beast the organization who lied to us, for two years mind you, that Trump colluded with Russia? Mark, please correct me if I'm wrong. Once someone lies to me several times, I put no stock in the further words. I guess that could be considered profiling.
The Daily Beast is top notch. Of course rdwoodpecker didn't cite his source.
At least DonDiego has the courage to admit he gets his information from Infowars. The same cant be said for rdwoodpecker. Thats allright,rd, it gives you a bar to rise up to.
As for another conspiracy against a person of color with no basis in fact - I'm sure its not racist. cause the people who make up that shit aren't racist. They're....inbred. Oh, wait, here's my source:
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
At least DonDiego has the courage to admit he gets his information from Infowars. The same cant be said for rdwoodpecker. Thats allright,rd, it gives you a bar to rise up to.
As for another conspiracy against a person of color with no basis in fact - I'm sure its not racist. cause the people who make up that shit aren't racist. They're....inbred. Oh, wait, here's my source:
Aren't such pictures racist?
Boilerman's post of 19 July 08:47 asks "Aren't such pictures racist ?"
DonDiego cannot tell the "race" of the individuals pictured.
But posting the photo is almost certainly an example of "lookism".
lookism: prejudice or discrimination based on physical appearance and especially physical appearance believed to fall short of societal notions of beauty
Ref: Merriam-Webster
. . . unless PJStroh did not intend the photo to suggest anything unattractive about the pictured gentlemen.
DonDiego opines that PJStroh's use of the word "inbred" also suggests some sort of prejudice against individulas who had no control over their conception.
"Tolerant Liberal"
Boo yah! I have deep, unfiltered prejudice towards inbred, tea party retards. Sue me.
but that has nothing to do with my post. I have it on very good authority those two gentlemen are the authors of RDWoodpecker's story. I got if from the same exact source he did.
