And here I thought it was a picture of Mark and PJ. I know it's how I picture them.
And here I thought it was a picture of Mark and PJ. I know it's how I picture them.
Originally posted by: Don
Boilerman's post of 19 July 08:47 asks "Aren't such pictures racist ?"
DonDiego cannot tell the "race" of the individuals pictured.
But posting the photo is almost certainly an example of "lookism".
lookism: prejudice or discrimination based on physical appearance and especially physical appearance believed to fall short of societal notions of beauty
Ref: Merriam-Webster
. . . unless PJStroh did not intend the photo to suggest anything unattractive about the pictured gentlemen.
DonDiego opines that PJStroh's use of the word "inbred" also suggests some sort of prejudice against individulas who had no control over their conception.
"Tolerant Liberal"
Diego, I agree that we can't tell the race of the men depicted in PJ's pictures.............and that's my point. If we're to be consistent and non-hypocritical, like our Liberal friends claim to be, mustn't we rule all derogatory inferences equally, making this racist?
Is "Inbred, tea-party retard" a race? If so, I'm guilty as charged. I can live with that.
In my defense, I dont advocate treating such people with sadisitc, cruel punishment in the spirit of making my dick hard vis-a-vis our resident FOX crowd and migrants at the border. SO there's that.