Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
The above statement is 100% false; furthermore, it's a lie (and not merely an inaccurate statement) because David knows it's false.
Furthermore, David knows very well the distinction between "not guilty" and "no evidence of that crime was found." David's walking around free right now because of that distinction--the jury didn't believe his victim's testimony, something that happens often at rape trials.
You are full of shit - and everyone with a functioning brain knows it.