Kevin Lewis: "DonDiego is 100% incorrect when he describes opposition to Trump
as 'partisan' ."
Definition:
partisan
adjective
__of, relating to, or characteristic of partisans; partial to a specific party, person, etc.
Umm, . . . DonDiego stands by his statement.
Adolf Lewis , Kevin Hitler - however you say it, they are YOU.
Im not sure Trump's opposition is so partisan.
Almost Every Republican presidential candidate pre-Trump from the last 30 years is/was anti-Trump: HW Bush, W Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney
And he's lost some of the loudest conservative voices from the last 40 years: George Will, Peggy Noonan, David Frum, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol...this is a partial list
And dont dare mention all of the Republican officialls involved with Comey/Mueller investigation. They dont qualify in the Trump era either.
Thr Republican party has fallen far from the tree. And it was a pretty ugly tree to begin with.
Nope, DonDiego doesn't get it. Partisan opposition to Trump would be if a given person who opposes him does so primarily because he is of a different political party than them.
Virtually no one hates Trump because he's a Republican. They hate him because he's a thief, a traitor, a liar, and an asshole. Those things transcend partisan considerations.
Do you have a neighbor, acquaintance, relative, etc. whom you dislike? If so, does that dislike stem from that person's political affiliation...or their behavior and demeanor?
Still not understanding the difference between a living person and a dead one...yet another sign of Stalker's irreversible cognitive decline (which is separate from being a complete asshole). So sad.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Im not sure Trump's opposition is so partisan.
Almost Every Republican presidential candidate pre-Trump from the last 30 years is/was anti-Trump: HW Bush, W Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney
And he's lost some of the loudest conservative voices from the last 40 years: George Will, Peggy Noonan, David Frum, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol...this is a partial list
And dont dare mention all of the Republican officialls involved with Comey/Mueller investigation. They dont qualify in the Trump era either.
Thr Republican party has fallen far from the tree. And it was a pretty ugly tree to begin with.
What about the American voters?
Originally posted by: Boilerman
What about the American voters?
You mean the ones who voted against Trump by a margin of over three million?
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You mean the ones who voted against Trump by a margin of over three million?
Ahh, . . . once again the brilliance of the Founding Fathers in establishing the Electoral College is revealed.
Originally posted by: Don
Ahh, . . . once again the brilliance of the Founding Fathers in establishing the Electoral College is revealed.
I like to refer to it as Affirmative Action for angry white nationalists. Because, lets be honest, thats exactly what it is.
What's "brilliant" about setting things up so that the loser of the election wins the office?
Let's face it, you'd be howling to the heavens about the EC if Obama had won the Presidency while losing the popular vote by three million. The candidate who gets the most votes should win. Since it's a national office, what's the point in breaking it up state by state? It's a clumsy anachronism.
The rule that the loser of the election actually wins--if he's a Republican--have gotten us the two worst Presidents in American history. With Dubya, we got two wars and a global recession. With Trump, we've gotten the destruction of everything good about this country.
