Promises Made. Promises Kept ?

Poor old DonDiego's a-gonna be an awfully old man by 2035, . . . but some interested readers might not be.  If'n they's a-been countin' on Social Security maybe they'd better start countin' on somethin' else.

 

Ref: Social Security's Funding Crisis Has Arrived

 

[a summary in 3 select paragraphs - DD]

 

The fund’s Trustees noted in an April report that net inflows into the Trust Fund will turn negative next year, commencing a demise that will see the Trust Fund go broke in 2035. Then, payroll taxes will cover only 79% of promised retiree benefits. Here’s the troubling part: “The projections and analyses in this year’s report do not reflect the potential effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Social Security program,” the Trustees stated in the annual report. Clearly, benefits will increase as more workers retire early or claim disability while payroll taxes swoon with the drop in employment.

 

The Trust Fund Trustees state that ensuring solvency over the next 75 years would require a 3.1- percentage point rise in the 12.4% current payroll tax that is split between employees and employers. Even less politically attractive would be an immediate 19% across-the-board cut in benefits. Waiting for the Trust Fund money to run out in 2035 would require a 4.1-percentage-point rise in the combined payroll tax or a 25% cut in benefits, the Trustees calculate.

 

If self-funded Social Security benefits are an entitlement that is no longer affordable, so too are state pension fund benefits. Decades of lush retiree benefits, overly-optimistic investment return assumptions, insufficiency pension fund contributions and lengthening retiree life spans have resulted in the liabilities of public pension funds exceeding assets by $1.2 trillion in 2018, according to the latest data and Pew Charitable Trusts. The pandemic will surely worsen the mismatch.

 

[Boldface added - DonDiego]

 

Ahh, . . . Big Government promises lead to Big Government problems.

 

And what has your orange god done to help the little Don?

DonDiego might be in opposition to the gigantic Trump tax windfall for billionaires and giant corporations that he rammed through in 2018. That move created a $1.8 trillion federal deficit and accelerated the onset of the time when Social Security (among other programs) will go broke by as much as two years.

 

I'm sure that Trumpers who will get shafted when the time comes for them to get their piece of the pie will be happy that their tax dollars have helped billionaires live their lives a bit more comfortably.

This whole paragraph is lying bullshit -"DonDiego might be in opposition to the gigantic Trump tax windfall for billionaires and giant corporations that he rammed through in 2018. That move created a $1.8 trillion federal deficit and accelerated the onset of the time when Social Security (among other programs) will go broke by as much as two years."

 


Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

DonDiego might be in opposition to the gigantic Trump tax windfall for billionaires and giant corporations that he rammed through in 2018. That move created a $1.8 trillion federal deficit and accelerated the onset of the time when Social Security (among other programs) will go broke by as much as two years.

 

I'm sure that Trumpers who will get shafted when the time comes for them to get their piece of the pie will be happy that their tax dollars have helped billionaires live their lives a bit more comfortably.


Kevin, did tax revenues increase after the Trump tax cut?  Ignoring this is, frankly, ignorant.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin, did tax revenues increase after the Trump tax cut?  Ignoring this is, frankly, ignorant.


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/05/us-tax-revenue-dropped-sharply-due-to-trump-tax-cuts-report.html

And ignoring a little research before posting is ignorant, too.

Try harder.

Kevin didn't answer the question.  Did tax revenue increase?  Kevin doesn't understand the article and those writer the article don't know what their talking about.  The headline doesn't have anything to do with the article.

Edited on Jul 15, 2020 6:38am
Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin didn't answer the question.  Did tax revenue increase?  Kevin doesn't understand the article and those writer the article don't know what their talking about.  The headline doesn't have anything to do with the article.


"Those writer the article don't know what their talking about."

 

Severe cognitive decline. It's sad.

SS recipients die, a law of nature.  SS payments cease after death.  I don't know the math.  I'd figure Don's sources have accounted for it.  Now if those in charge will do their jobs and insure payments do not continue beyond the grave.   Hell, the last time we moved it wasn't one week until the junk mail found us at our new address.

 

2020 to 2035.  Hmm...15 years, enough time to:

 

"Teach...your children (and grands) well..." (music note imoges), to not depend on this system.  Plan ahead, achieve skill sets, make yourself essential, and multi-talented/flexible.   Take business courses (I wish I had), how to build a retirement nest egg, the benefits of compounding and delayed gratification.   Look for companies that provide for retirement, health insurance after retirement, etc.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

"Those writer the article don't know what their talking about."

 

Severe cognitive decline. It's sad.


Kevin, did tax revenues increase after the tax cut?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now