Kevin makes a point about respecting the office of POTUS regardless of who it is...despite the segue into "his predecessor" territory. But the basic point is well taken. I can't imagine the challenges of the job. Decades ago the office itself was accorded due respect even when the office holder wasn't popular with our dad or liked by the guy next door. If the pres came to our town it was an honor and everyone gave it its due respect, whether or not they went to the parade and cheered, because he was the President.
Times have changed, including individual concepts of what "respect" means. The example that comes to mind is how students viewed school teachers decades ago. We all had some we liked and some we didn't like for various reasons, but we feared them! They had the power! They could send notes home ratting us out! They could send us to the principal's office! They could schooch a point to bring a C+ to a B- if they thought we were trying hard and we didn't give them trouble in the classroom. We who were taught manners at home would not have DARED to sass the teacher. Parents took the teacher's word for it if told we were causing problems or weren't applying ourselves. The teacher got the benefit of the doubt, not the kid, who would be lucky not to get a whipping or grounded for two weeks.
In the USA we are still a democracy. Our leader's 6 X 10 foot portrait is not plastered all over town; we aren't forced to salute them, to march in lockstep, to faux cheer at parades or else someone would come in the night to take us away. Our leaders have to vie for election every four years, not remain in power until they die and/or pass the office to their favorite son without the people having anything to say about it. [No need to go into the last election, stolen or not, etc.] Our leaders have to please a lot of people vying for funding, rule changes, re-election of course, and all kinds of problems and issues we have no idea about.
So far they've all been men, and like most humans fallible for something. FDR cheated on his wife and tried to hide his disability from the public. IKE got elected based on his military service, was fortunate to be POTUS in peace time and prosperity, at least for the US. Kennedy was a womanizer; his influential father a bootlegger who bought the election for him (JMHO), popular based much on his looks and personality. He was in the right place at the right time, married the best woman who added cache to his personna. And he did some honorary military service. Lots to like, lots to not like. Nixon was manipulated into being a pretty despicable person. Jimmy Carter's presidency is said to be the worst in modern history, but few can say he wasn't an honorable man who did good things for the comman man after his term.
Biden certainly is facing some terrible situations, getting 'advice' (more like mandates) from all corners as do most presidents. Many have had to answer for results of war, i.e. soldiers and citizens captured and tortured and killed. Now it is terrorism as much as or more than formally defined wars where eventually somebody surrenders. Not all will be liked or respected for their personal attributes or what decisions they were forced into making.
But, good or bad presidential performance, they are due the respect of the office put in charge of a democratic (lower case d) government. Not the man, the office.
Again, JMHO.
Candy