Mark goes off on the liberal rant of President Trump is a dictator, but is missing the point that Mueller has a long history of malicious prosecutions & based on that ishe is not the right man for this job
Mark goes off on the liberal rant of President Trump is a dictator, but is missing the point that Mueller has a long history of malicious prosecutions & based on that ishe is not the right man for this job
No, he doesn’t. The crap you are reciting is conservative fan fiction created by right-wingers for right-wingers.
And I have got news for you. He is a dictator if he fires the people (including his own appointees) that are investigating him for criminal conduct. What I am reading tells me there has been a treasure trove of evidence seized in the Cohen raid.
Congressional Republicans and Democrats praised the Justice Department’s decision to appoint Robert S. Mueller III as special counsel to investigate possible coordination between Trump associates and Russia in the 2016 campaign — sparking a rare moment of bipartisanship on Capitol Hill over a politically charged issue.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) “By having someone like Bob Mueller head the investigation assures the American people that there’s no undue influence, be it here or be it at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, or within the Justice Department or FBI,” Burr said.
“My priority has been to ensure thorough and independent investigations are allowed to follow the facts wherever they may lead,” Ryan said in a statement. “That is what we’ve been doing here in the House. The addition of Robert Mueller as special counsel is consistent with this goal, and I welcome his role at the Department of Justice.”
“Mueller is a great selection. Impeccable credentials. Should be widely accepted,” tweeted House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).
Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), one of his party’s most imperiled lawmakers in next year’s elections, said Mueller “has got a good background in terms of not being partisan and I hope he gets down to the bottom of what really is a growing list of allegations.” Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-Va.), another embattled incumbent, tweeted that appointing Mueller was the “Right thing to do and the right choice.”
Source
Mark has an answer for everything - whether real or imagined.
Nope. I think my record is darn good. I told you guys months ago the Stormy Daniels story was going to be big. Nobody believed me.
Her Attorney goaded Trump and Cohen into making public admissions of criminal activity. The FBI took the easy uncontested layup. The DOJ just announced an hour ago that Cohen is officially under criminal investigation.
Republican James Comey is a liberal hack according to the birth certififcate guy.
Republican Bob Mueller is a liberal hack according to the birth certificate guy.
And here's the best one....Republican Scooter Libbey that outed CIA operatives in retaliation to their truth telling about the BUsh Administrations WMD hunt....the same endeavor Trump railed against througout his campaign...that Scooter Libbey is now a hero according to the birth certifacte guy...
The only question left is how accountable will Republicans be in holding this scumbag when he stops the current investigation... and how hypocritical will the Bengazhi-gate crowd react? I think I have a pretty good idea on both fronts.
Originally posted by: Mark
No, he doesn’t. The crap you are reciting is conservative fan fiction created by right-wingers for right-wingers.
And I have got news for you. He is a dictator if he fires the people (including his own appointees) that are investigating him for criminal conduct. What I am reading tells me there has been a treasure trove of evidence seized in the Cohen raid.
Congressional Republicans and Democrats praised the Justice Department’s decision to appoint Robert S. Mueller III as special counsel to investigate possible coordination between Trump associates and Russia in the 2016 campaign — sparking a rare moment of bipartisanship on Capitol Hill over a politically charged issue.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) “By having someone like Bob Mueller head the investigation assures the American people that there’s no undue influence, be it here or be it at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, or within the Justice Department or FBI,” Burr said.
“My priority has been to ensure thorough and independent investigations are allowed to follow the facts wherever they may lead,” Ryan said in a statement. “That is what we’ve been doing here in the House. The addition of Robert Mueller as special counsel is consistent with this goal, and I welcome his role at the Department of Justice.”
“Mueller is a great selection. Impeccable credentials. Should be widely accepted,” tweeted House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).
Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), one of his party’s most imperiled lawmakers in next year’s elections, said Mueller “has got a good background in terms of not being partisan and I hope he gets down to the bottom of what really is a growing list of allegations.” Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-Va.), another embattled incumbent, tweeted that appointing Mueller was the “Right thing to do and the right choice.”
Source
It was welcomed because THERE WAS NO COLLUSION by the Trump campaign, and they all knew it. There WAS collusion, but it was the Clinton campaign and the DNC who paid Steele to produce the phoney dosier after actually meeting with Russians connected with the Kremlin, and futher collusion with the issuance of FISA warrants based on a phoney, unvetted dosier.
Normal law enforcement procedures are: a crime is commited and law enforcement investigates to find who commited the crime. Political law enforcement procedures are: partisans investigate people trying to find crimes without cause, other than said partisanship. It's ass-backward, a sick twisting of our justice system, and very easy to recognize.
Whats the legal term for meeting with Russian operatives with the specific and documented intention of getting intelligence about your political opponent? Apparently its not collusion.
Obama and HIllary were ivestigated as I recall with the same ass-backwards procedure -(much to Bob's delight)...but they didn't fire the investigators or go on a national smear campaign to undermine the FBI.
I dont recall any indictments arrising either.
Originally posted by: Bob Orme
Normal law enforcement procedures are: a crime is commited and law enforcement investigates to find who commited the crime. Political law enforcement procedures are: partisans investigate people trying to find crimes without cause, other than said partisanship. It's ass-backward, a sick twisting of our justice system, and very easy to recognize.
Bob, I will let you in on a little secret. 90% of crimes are solved when somebody says something stupid and incriminates themselves. Cohen – I took out a home equity loan to pay Stormy 130k and the president doesn’t know anything about it. Bank Fraud, Campaign Finance violations and attorney misconduct were admitted to right there.
Mark - please tell me just how a home equity loan is bank fraud. Also, please tell me how taking out a home equity loan is a campaign finance violation. And also tell me how taking out a home finance loan is attorney misconduct.
