OJ was found not guilty for the very reason we all know that it was. Black jurors wanted a black man set free for murdering white people, and white jurors were fearful of being murdered if they found him guilty. End of story. Everyone knew that he was guilty.
OJ had the top legal eagles of America who could clobber most any defense, any evidence. The defense team was so weak (in performance, credentials), laughably obvious to the casual TV viewer, perhaps by design.
I've done jury duty. Jurors are only to decide on facts presented, put aside the nuances, personal feelings/experiences, etc.
No doubt OJ's jurors couldn't let pass this opportunity to see a wealthy Black mega-celebrity 'finally' be able to legally and in high profile thumb their noses (theirs/the jurors, not necessarily OJ's?) at white America. JMHO.
Candy
Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
OJ had the top legal eagles of America who could clobber most any defense, any evidence. The defense team was so weak (in performance, credentials), laughably obvious to the casual TV viewer, perhaps by design.
I've done jury duty. Jurors are only to decide on facts presented, put aside the nuances, personal feelings/experiences, etc.
No doubt OJ's jurors couldn't let pass this opportunity to see a wealthy Black mega-celebrity 'finally' be able to legally and in high profile thumb their noses (theirs/the jurors, not necessarily OJ's?) at white America. JMHO.
Candy
The DNA evidence was enough to find him guilty without a question. Everyone around him has admitted that OJ was guilty, because they all heard the evidence. It's was all about black jurrors that wanted a black man to get away with murdering a white person, and white people knowing they would be a murder target of blacks if they voted for conviction. Hell, there's blacks admitting that know.
