San Francisco - Makes Pelosi Proud

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

I'm a poor typist. You guys, on the other hand, are terrible spellers. The former is a result of poor manual dexterity--which is the case with me. The latter is a result of poor education and/or intellect--which is the case with you. I make many more typos than you wind up seeing--because I go over what I write, and edit it if necessary.

 

I can tell whether your multiple childish errors are typographical or spelling errors. I only criticize your spelling errors, not your typos. There's a big difference between the two.

 

Example: while your "slighest error" blunder in your last post is something you should have caught and corrected, I doubt that you really don't know how to spell "slightest." You obviously missed a key, typing too quickly while you frothed at the mouth in anger. That wasn't a failure of intellect per se on your part.

 

Just to be clear: you are, in fact, a stupid Trump-licking traitorous lying asshole. But only your spelling, not your typographical, errors underscore that sad fact.


    You cannot excuse yourself out of this.  Typical lying liberal intellect - "Do as I say, not as I do."  Everyone knows who the liar here is.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

I'm a poor typist. You guys, on the other hand, are terrible spellers. The former is a result of poor manual dexterity--which is the case with me. The latter is a result of poor education and/or intellect--which is the case with you. I make many more typos than you wind up seeing--because I go over what I write, and edit it if necessary.

 

I can tell whether your multiple childish errors are typographical or spelling errors. I only criticize your spelling errors, not your typos. There's a big difference between the two.

 

Example: while your "slighest error" blunder in your last post is something you should have caught and corrected, I doubt that you really don't know how to spell "slightest." You obviously missed a key, typing too quickly while you frothed at the mouth in anger. That wasn't a failure of intellect per se on your part.

 

Just to be clear: you are, in fact, a stupid Trump-licking traitorous lying asshole. But only your spelling, not your typographical, errors underscore that sad fact.


I'll trade being a poor speller vs having a complete lack of Economics 101 understanding like Kevin.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

I'll trade being a poor speller vs having a complete lack of Economics 101 understanding like Kevin.


You can honk that foolish horn a thousand times if you wish, but unlike you, I actually enrolled in and passed Economics 101. And every post you make here shows your complete ignorance of the subject.

Originally posted by: David Miller

    You cannot excuse yourself out of this.  Typical lying liberal intellect - "Do as I say, not as I do."  Everyone knows who the liar here is.


"Excuse" what? I made a typographical error. Make a big deal of it if you want. You're scum either way.


Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

"Excuse" what? I made a typographical error. Make a big deal of it if you want. You're scum either way.


   There is no excuse for you. You make a "big deal" when others do exactly what you did and have done before in the past. 

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

David thinks Nancy Pelosi is the mayor of San Francisco. Or its chief of police. Or maybe both.


Come to think of it, she would have a lot to be proud of. You know, half the murder rate found in (mayor?) Kevin McCarthy's district.

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Come to think of it, she would have a lot to be proud of. You know, half the murder rate found in (mayor?) Kevin McCarthy's district.


    Here is the original post, it does not deal with "murders" - it deals with the current homeless situation in Pelosi's district and San Francisco. I know that whenever you liberals do not like or agree with a post that shows just how worthless DemocRatic rule is, you always try to derail the post by talking about things that have nothing to do with the original post.  --- https://fb.watch/cHHp6gy_WU/

Originally posted by: David Miller

    Here is the original post, it does not deal with "murders" - it deals with the current homeless situation in Pelosi's district and San Francisco. I know that whenever you liberals do not like or agree with a post that shows just how worthless DemocRatic rule is, you always try to derail the post by talking about things that have nothing to do with the original post.  --- https://fb.watch/cHHp6gy_WU/


High murder rate = Bad! High homeless rate = Bad! I bet we can agree on that.

 

But personally, I would take Nancy Pelosi's district's high homeless rate over Kevin McCarthy's district's DOUBLE the murder rate.

 

But we can agree to disagree on that.

San Francisco, under firm Democratic rule, BWA HA HA HA HAAAA, one of the highest per capita incomes in the country. Fourth largest economic output in the country, though only the 12th largest by population (metro areas).

 

San Francisco actually counts its homeless and provides for them--which makes it appear to have a greater number of homeless than cities that ignore them or worse, chase them out of town or kill them. And there's another reason for the high homeless population--the weather is survivable year-round.

 

Any discussion of San Francisco's homeless population--at least any rational discussion, which excludes David's Facebook shit and associated ranting--shouldn't be a judgment of its government. Compassionate treatment of the homeless makes them more visible. I'm sure that RepubliQ shit-kicker cities where being nonwhite is often a capital offense have fewer visible (and countable) homeless. Not fewer actual homeless. Just fewer visible homeless.

 

After all, if you're a homeless person in San Francisco and you poke your head up, you might get a bowl of soup and a bed, whereas if you're a homeless person in Redneckville, you poke your head up and you might get beaten to death by the police, which city is going to appear to have more homeless people?

 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now