Proof:
1.Climate change gave the firefighting equipment away to Ukraine.
2. Climate change didn't fill the reservoirs
3. Climate change diverted water to the ocean to save the smelt fish
4. Climate change fired 200 firefighters for not getting the jab
5. Climate change cut $20 million from the firefighting budget
Makes sense, too much man made CO2 did this, quit being a denier, you pedo clown,
California's reservoirs were designed to be only partially full at the beginning of the rainy season. Otherwise, they would overflow and there would be flooding.
The level of reservoirs--anywhere, not just California--depends on rainfall. No one can make a decision to "fill" a reservoir, unless they have godly power over the weather.
Stupid Iggo.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
California's reservoirs were designed to be only partially full at the beginning of the rainy season. Otherwise, they would overflow and there would be flooding.
The level of reservoirs--anywhere, not just California--depends on rainfall. No one can make a decision to "fill" a reservoir, unless they have godly power over the weather.
Stupid Iggo.
Really? Then why has water been diverted to the ocean? Reserviors in California were/are only 2/3 full, there was no reason to divert water to the ocean - except the appease the bleeding heart liberals who care more about a small fish than humans. Face it, Newscum and the California DemocRats have screwed up royally and the state and citizens are paying the price.
Truly Kevin is so full of TDS he's blaming Republicans and the weather for tragedy caused by DEI and liberal policies.
QaAron is so full of TDS he actually thinks the bone spur coward understands climate science better than climate scientists.
He's in the right party !
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
QaAron is so full of TDS he actually thinks the bone spur coward understands climate science better than climate scientists.
He's in the right party !
I think Iggo's just being deliberately stupid now.
Money was allocated 11 years ago and to date nothing has been built. There was an opportunity to expand the water storage but Ca didn't do it. Newsom has removed dams under his tenure.
The lack of water storage is at the democratic and newsom's doorstep.
In November 2014, California voters approved Proposition 1: The Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act. The $7.5 billion bond dedicated $2.7 billion for the public benefits of new water storage projects.
In January 2023, California’s Republican congressional delegation, including Reps. David Valadao of Hanford (Kings County) and Tom McClintock of Elk Grove (Sacramento County) expressed concern about the lack of storage, sending a letter to Newsom and President Biden urging a boost in capacity in light of the recent precipitation.
It's a cluster and there is only one party to blame.
Well, again, California's resevoirs are all at normal levels or higher. Anyone who says resevoir shortages played any roll in the current issue is just flat out lying through their teeth....and thats 3 people I count on this thread so far. ANd its par for the course given their posting history.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Well, again, California's resevoirs are all at normal levels or higher. Anyone who says resevoir shortages played any roll in the current issue is just flat out lying through their teeth....and thats 3 people I count on this thread so far. ANd its par for the course given their posting history.
You can add to your count the thousands of Californians, the media, congressmen and women. We "three" are just reporting the facts and not the lying hyperbole you spew.
