She is Spot On

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

---

It is a link to a video. A woman speaking in that really annoying social media influencer cadence with some up speak goes on a bit of a rant. 

 

First she cusses up a storm. Then she basically alleges that everything bad about the last 10 years is a manufactured event brought by the DNC to distract from government corruption. (No acknowledgment that government corruption is as old as government itself). And to prevent Trump from ending said corruption. 

 

Then she seems to make a claim that most or all protesters are slaves to the Democratic Party and are not capable of thinking for themselves. 

 

Then she mentioned some other government corruption. Some seemed legitimate some seemed less legitimate. Then she claimed that Trump will right all the wrongs in America. 

 

She of course didn't mention that Donald Trump has been a big part of government corruption since before she was born. 

 

For what its worth I don't have Facebook either but was able to watch it. 

 

 

 

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

 Your synopsis is mostly correct. She never said (in these words) - "that Trump would right all wrongs in Ammerica."  You also barely touched on the "other government corruption" in which she listed several true facts. --- Since you don't have Facebook, maybe you can tell NC-LowRoller how he can watch the video.

---

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

---

It is a link to a video. A woman speaking in that really annoying social media influencer cadence with some up speak goes on a bit of a rant. 

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

 Your synopsis is mostly correct. She never said (in these words) - "that Trump would right all wrongs in Ammerica."  You also barely touched on the "other government corruption" in which she listed several true facts. --- Since you don't have Facebook, maybe you can tell NC-LowRoller how he can watch the video.

---

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas

---

 

Well stated by LiveFreeNW.

 

For David Miller.  I do open some of yours posts.  Problems:

 

 - Your pieces start up so many decibels louder than average that it almost knocks me out of my chair.  Yes, I can reach for my speaker knob, or click on the volume icon and turn it down, but it is annoying. 

 

 

 - The other problem, David:  While you lead with hyper titles and intros such as "This is the Absolute Truth" and "Read the Real Story", and "Finally Here It Is:" it turns into a rant from some influencer with NO credibility IMO, or something cut and pasted (maybe not by you but something you forwarded).

 

Just tell the topic/subject, such as "thoughts from MLK's letter from the Birmingham jail."  Or "More from the Minneapolis protest", or "Streaker tackled by football player."  Plus, I suggest you not lead them with "This is the truth" or similar indications of your own superior take on a matter.  Not necessary, and may get more readers, if that is your objective.  JMHO.

 

Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

  I don't control the volume. These rants you allude to are are opinions by other people who have the right to utter the disdain for whatever they are talking about. Funny, I don't see your critique concerning the "rants" of Lewis, Mark and others here in the Sink. Apparently you object to my opinion of the posts that I make when I make a post. In the future, I suggest that you not read my posts because they may be (1) too loud, (2) have my opinion attached, (3) have content that "some influncer with no credibility" may have  posted (4) be a post that was posted to Facebook. Or you could save yourself from any content posted by me by just blocking me. 

---

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

---

You really can't read, can you? Candy didn't criticize the content of your posts (as awful as that is). She criticized how you PRESENT it--especially with those pompous, screaming headlines that you are hereby presenting the noble TROOTY TROOT.

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

  I never said that Candy criticized the content of my posts - those are your words. Your interpretation and you unwanted comments are moot. Mind your own business - my response to Candy is between Candy and I. 

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

  I don't control the volume. These rants you allude to are are opinions by other people who have the right to utter the disdain for whatever they are talking about. Funny, I don't see your critique concerning the "rants" of Lewis, Mark and others here in the Sink. Apparently you object to my opinion of the posts that I make when I make a post. In the future, I suggest that you not read my posts because they may be (1) too loud, (2) have my opinion attached, (3) have content that "some influncer with no credibility" may have  posted (4) be a post that was posted to Facebook. Or you could save yourself from any content posted by me by just blocking me. 

---

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas

---

I never hesitate to give Kevin grief about something I have a problem with.  He usually takes it well and explains further (and further, and further...LOL). 

 

You didn't find my suggestions useful; I get it.  Happy trails.

 

Candy  

---