Originally posted by: Vegas Todd
Why don't you go there and make a citizens arrest if it bothers you so much?
You can be the big hero...
The remarkable thing about Toad's above comment is the fact that he is not himself bothered by fact that laws are being broken and he seemingly has no problem with that fact. Toad is and remains nothing more than a lying troll....
Originally posted by: David Miller
The remarkable thing about Toad's above comment is the fact that he is not himself bothered by fact that laws are being broken and he seemingly has no problem with that fact. Toad is and remains nothing more than a lying troll....
Just creepy how fast you show up.
Like you're just waiting for anyone to post.
That's some existance you have there, Davee-Boi.
But, at least the neighborhood children and small pets are safe from you....
Originally posted by: Vegas Todd
Just creepy how fast you show up.
Like you're just waiting for anyone to post.
That's some existance you have there, Davee-Boi.
But, at least the neighborhood children and small pets are safe from you....
What I find as "amazing" is your constant posting of redundant, lying bullshit...
Originally posted by: tom
As usual Kevin can't face facts, no matter how often they are posted.
Title 18 S1507 of the US code
Public sidewalks are public spaces and peaceful protestors may use those spaces to exercise their free speech rights.
Even if stupid, stupid Tommie-poo thinks otherwise.
Originally posted by: Vegas Todd
Just creepy how fast you show up.
Like you're just waiting for anyone to post.
That's some existance you have there, Davee-Boi.
But, at least the neighborhood children and small pets are safe from you....
Davey Dog really is kinda creepy that way.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/05/20/ginni-thomas-arizona-election-emails/
The 1/6 commitee needs to haul this crazy bitch in to answer some questions.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/20/us/politics/ginni-thomas-election-trump.html?smid=tw-share
As usual TK is to lazy to read. Protests outside judges homes are not allowed.
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,...or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Tommie-poo, are you truly too stupid to comprehend the word "INTENT" as it is mentioned in this statute?
The statute is specific. It DOES NOT SAY THAT PROTESTING OUTSIDE THE HOME OF A JUDGE IS ILLEGAL. The protestors outside the scumbag's house weren't attempting to influence his decision. Therefore, their presence was perfectly legal and they were exercising their civil rights.
WHICH IS WHY THEY WEREN'T ARRESTED OR CHARGED. Stupid Tommie-poo.
You seem to think that the statute says that protestors can never go near a judge's house. That's not true at all. READ it, stupid Tommie-poo.
Ignorant, stupid Tommie-poo.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Tommie-poo, are you truly too stupid to comprehend the word "INTENT" as it is mentioned in this statute?
The statute is specific. It DOES NOT SAY THAT PROTESTING OUTSIDE THE HOME OF A JUDGE IS ILLEGAL. The protestors outside the scumbag's house weren't attempting to influence his decision. Therefore, their presence was perfectly legal and they were exercising their civil rights.
WHICH IS WHY THEY WEREN'T ARRESTED OR CHARGED. Stupid Tommie-poo.
You seem to think that the statute says that protestors can never go near a judge's house. That's not true at all. READ it, stupid Tommie-poo.
Ignorant, stupid Tommie-poo.
Lewis lying again -- the "protestors" WERE and ARE attempting to influence the judges by intimidation.
Now, dumb Davey Dog claims to be a mind reader! L O fucking L.
